State v. The American Book Company

Decision Date21 July 1902
Docket Number13,194
Citation65 Kan. 847,69 P. 563
PartiesTHE STATE OF KANSAS, ex rel., v. THE AMERICAN BOOK COMPANY
CourtKansas Supreme Court

Decided July, 1902.

Original proceeding in quo warranto.

Petition denied.

Galen Nichols, and Quinton & Quinton, for The State.

A. M Harvey, F. Dumont Smith, and Rossington, Smith & Histed for defendant.

DOSTER C. J., SMITH, GREENE, JJ.

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In this case the plaintiff seeks to oust the defendant from the prosecution of the business of selling and contracting for the sale of school-books and to annul a contract recently made by it with the state text-book commission for supplying certain school-books. The grounds of the application are that the defendant, as a foreign corporation, has not complied with chapter 10, Laws of 1898, and the amendatory statute of 1901 (Gen. Stat. 1901, § 1259 et seq.), entitling it to do business in the state.

The company has complied, although irregularly, informally, and out of time, with the law, except as to section 2 of said act. As to those particulars in which compliance has been attempted, but not technically executed, the statute is directory. Section 2 requires the making of an application to the charter board and the furnishing of certain information to such board. These things the company must do in order to acquire the status of a foreign corporation authorized to do business here. The statute requires the doing of these things by foreign corporations "seeking to do business in this state." Inasmuch as the defendant had been doing business in this state before the enactment of the law, it contends that it was not "seeking to do business" here. It contends that the words "seeking to do business" apply only to corporations which had not theretofore done business, but desired to do it in the future. This is an erroneous view. The statute does not mean thus to discriminate in the requirements of said section 2, and in other like matters, between foreign corporations which had theretofore been doing business here and those which might thereafter apply to do business.

The claim that, because the defendant company is engaged in interstate trade, it cannot be subjected to the regulations of the law of 1898, is untenable. It may be that it cannot be excluded from doing interstate business here, but it can be laid under such reasonable conditions as the filing of its charter, the payment of charter fees, the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • State v. The Western Union Telegraph Company.
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • May 11, 1907
    ... ... [75 ... Kan. 618] This question already has been decided adversely to ... the defendant in the case of The State v. Book Co., ... 65 Kan. 847, 69 P. 563, where it was said: ... "Inasmuch ... as the defendant had been doing business in this state before ... 15.) It may oblige the defendant to appoint ... an authorized agent to represent it at a known place of ... business within the state. ( American Union Telegraph Co ... v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 67 Ala. 26, 42 Am. Rep ... 90.) And it may in addition to ordinary taxation levy a tax ... ...
  • Dahl Implement & Lumber Co. v. Campbell
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • March 24, 1920
    ... 178 N.W. 197 45 N.D. 239 DAHL IMPLEMENT & LUMBER COMPANY, a Corporation, Respondent, v. E. A. CAMPBELL, P. J. Campbell, and Wm ... 7 Cyc. p ... 416, subd. 5; State Freight Tax Case, 82 U.S. 232; ... American Starch Co. v. Bateman (Tex.) ... rel. Shaween County v. American Book Co. 65 Kan. 847, 69 ... P. 563; John Deere Plow Co. v. Wyland, 69 Kan ... ...
  • Chi. Crayon Co. v. Rogers
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • November 18, 1911
    ...the business of the foreign corporation was purely interstate commerce, citing Deere v. Wyland, 69 Kan. 255, 76 P. 863, State v. Book Company, 65 Kan. 847, 69 P. 563, Commission Company v. Haston, 68 Kan. 749, 75 P. 1028, and said that, in the judgment of the court, the rulings in those cas......
  • Chicago Crayon Co. v. Rogers
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • November 18, 1911
    ... ... sureties on the bond ...          A state ... cannot require a foreign corporation to designate a resident ...          Action ... by the Chicago Crayon Company against Henderson G. Rogers and ... others. Judgment for defendants, and ...          The ... case of International Text-Book Co. v. Pigg, 217 ... U.S. 91, 30 S.Ct. 481, 54 L.Ed. 678, 24 L. R. A ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT