State v. then
| Citation | 196 A. 740 |
| Decision Date | 26 January 1938 |
| Docket Number | No. 21.,21. |
| Parties | STATE of NEW JERSEY, Defendant In Error, v. Anthony M. THEN, Plaintiff In Error. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey) |
Error to Supreme Court.
Leo Robbins, of Lakewood, for defendant in error. George T. Vickers, of Jersey City, for plaintiff in error.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court, reported in 118 N.J.L. 31, 190 A. 495.
For affirmance: The CHANCELLOR, Justices PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, and DONGES, and Judges DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, and RAFFERTY —9.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
State v. Zwillman
... ... The State's case was based almost entirely upon Cortese's testimony. It was contended that the operation was that Cortese would give the defendant a location insured by Maryland Casualty Company. Defendant would then write a letter to the insured on behalf of an alleged client. The claim letter would come to Cortese who would order a physical examination and then settle the claim with the defendant. The defendant submitted reports from a doctor who allegedly treated the claimants and releases allegedly signed ... ...
-
State v. Boone
... ... See State v. Zwillman, 112 N.J.Super. 6, 13-14, 270 A.2d 284 (App.Div.1970), certif. den. 57 N.J. 603, 274 A.2d 56 (1971); State v. Then, 118 N.J.L. 31, 40-41, 190 A. 495 (Sup.Ct.1937), aff'd o.b. 119 N.J.L. 429, 196 A. 740 (E. & A.1938). Cf. Evid.R. 55; State v. Mulero, 51 N.J. 224, 228, 238 A.2d 682 (1968); State v. Baldwin, 47 N.J. 379, 391, 221 A.2d 199 (1966) ... However, as a matter of proper trial practice ... ...