State v. Thomas

Decision Date29 October 1888
PartiesSTATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. MOLLIE THOMAS, Appellant.
CourtKansas Court of Appeals

Appeal from Jasper Circuit Court. --HON. M. G MCGREGOR, Judge.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

The case is stated in the opinion.

T B. Haughawout and J. W. McAntire, for the appellant.

B G. Boone, Attorney General, for the State.

HALL J.

The defendant was indicted for a misdemeanor. When the case was called for trial, the state announced ready for trial, and the defendant announced that she was not ready for trial, and asked that the case stand over until the succeeding day, which the court refused, and a jury was ordered and sworn to answer questions.

The defendant asked to be allowed time to prepare and file an application for a continuance, and time was allowed defendant for that purpose; thereupon the defendant had prepared and filed the following application, affidavits and notice:

" State of Missouri )
vs. )
Mollie Thomas. )

Comes now the defendant and after being duly sworn on her oath says, she believes she cannot have a fair and impartial trial in the above trial before M. G. McGregor, judge of this court, on account of the bias and prejudice of said judge against her and that said judge will not afford her a fair trial; that the knowledge of the said prejudice came to defendant on the thirteenth day of October, 1887.

[Signed] MOLLIE THOMAS.
State of Missouri, )
) ss.
County of Jasper. )

Mollie Thomas the above-named defendant, on her oath says that the facts set forth in the foregoing application are true to the best of her knowledge and belief, and that the defendant believes that she cannot have a fair and impartial trial in this cause on account of the bias and prejudice of M. G. McGregor, judge of this court, against her.

[Signed] MOLLIE THOMAS.

Subscribed and sworn to before me this thirteenth day of October, 1887.

[Signed] B. F. HACKNEY, Clerk.
State of Missouri, )
County of Jasper. )

George Simpson and Charles Alstead, each being duly sworn on their oath say that they are neither of kin or counsel to the defendant, Mollie Thomas, and that M. G. McGregor, the judge of the court in which the cause is pending, will not afford the defendant a fair trial on account of the bias and prejudice of said judge against defendant.

[Signed] GEORGE SIMPSON,
CHARLES L. ALSTEAD.

Subscribed and sworn to before me this thirteenth day of October, 1887.

B. F. HACKNEY, Clerk.

In the circuit court of Jasper county, September term, 1887.

State of Missouri )
vs. )
Mollie Thomas. )

To W M. Robinson, prosecuting attorney, of Jasper county: You are hereby notified that the defendant will, on the thirteenth day of October, 1887, apply for a change of venue from M. G. McGregor,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • State v. Noland
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • September 20, 1892
    ... ... of embezzlement, and should be charged in the indictment ... Ridgeway v. State, 41 Tex. 231; State v ... McCollum, 44 Mo. 343; 4 American & English Encyclopedia ... of Law, 746; Huntsman v. State, 12 Tex.App. 619; ... dissenting opinion of Judge Thomas in State v ... Harmon, 18 S.W. 134; People v. Hurst, 62 Mich ... 276; Guest v. State, 24 Tex.App. 235; State v ... Schermer, 55 Mo. 83. (2) When the court sustained ... defendant's application for a change of venue, it had no ... power to permit defendant to withdraw said ... ...
  • State v. Silva
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 19, 1895
    ... ... The entire ... proceedings under Judge Shackleford were coram non judice ... State v. Moberly, 121 Mo. 604; State v ... Hayes, 81 Mo. 574; S. C., 88 Mo. 344; State v ... Schaffer, 36 Mo.App. 589; State v. Shea, 95 Mo ... 85; State v. Shipman, 93 Mo. 147; State v ... Thomas, 32 Mo.App. 159; State v. Hopper, 71 Mo ... 425; State v. Worrell, 25 Mo. 205; Lacy v ... Barrett, 75 Mo. 469; Henderson v. Henderson, 55 ... Mo. 544; Dawson v. Dawson, 29 Mo.App. 521; ... Gale's Adm'r v. Mitchie, 47 Mo. 326; ... Goodhue v. People, 94 Ill. 37; Colvin v ... ...
  • The State v. Crane
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 5, 1907
    ...judge, who tried the case, to act. Secs. 2594, 2595, R. S. 1899. Defendant was the only proper person to make the affidavit. State v. Thomas, 32 Mo.App. 159; State v. Brownfield, 83 Mo. 452; State Shipman, 93 Mo. 157; State v. Sumner, 143 Mo. 228. (2) The plea in abatement and motion to qua......
  • State v. Nave
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 13, 1904
    ... ... nullity and conferred no jurisdiction on that court. R. S ... 1899, secs. 2494 and 2595; Dawson v. Dawson, 29 ... Mo.App. 521; State v. Schaffer, 36 Mo.App. 589; ... Lacy v. Barrett, 75 Mo. 469; State v ... Bulling, 100 Mo. 87; State v. Shipman, 93 Mo ... 147; State v. Thomas, 32 Mo.App. 159; State v ... Dusenberry, 112 Mo. 288; State ex rel. v. Lay, ... 128 Mo. 611. (3) The prosecuting attorney of Ozark county and ... the defendant's attorneys could not stipulate the case ... out of the Ozark circuit court, or out of the circuit. It ... required the order of ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT