State v. Thomas

Decision Date27 June 2014
Docket NumberNo. 109,951.,109,951.
CitationState v. Thomas, 327 P.3d 1052 (Kan. App. 2014)
PartiesSTATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Sheena THOMAS, Appellant.
CourtKansas Court of Appeals
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for resentencing.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • State v. Marinelli
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • April 13, 2018
    ...guilty or nolo contendere. Further, I agree with the rationale of Justice Johnson's concurring opinion in State v. Thomas 307 Kan. ––––, –––– – ––––, 327 P.3d 1052, 2014 WL 3020029 (No. 109,951, this day decided), slip op. at 24-33, that also concludes that KORA registration is a part of se......
  • State v. Gilkes
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • April 13, 2018
    ...weapon finding. The court's order for Gilkes to register as a violent offender is vacated. See State v. Thomas , 307 Kan. ––––, 327 P.3d 1052, 2014 WL 3020029 (No. 109951, this day decided). FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The State charged Gilkes with two counts of aggravated assault, al......