State v. Todd

Docket Number18A14-2
Decision Date09 June 2017

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
34 cases
  • State v. Allen
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 13 Agosto 2021
    ...Under the first prong of the Strickland test, a defendant must "establish that counsel's performance was deficient." State v. Todd , 369 N.C. 707, 710, 799 S.E.2d 834 (2017). To prove deficient performance, "the defendant must show that counsel's representation fell below an objective stand......
  • State v. Collington
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 25 Septiembre 2020
    ...review" in non-capital cases of motions for appropriate relief "determined by the Court of Appeals"); with State v. Todd , 369 N.C. 707, 710, 799 S.E.2d 834, 837 (2017) (holding that this Court may "exercise its rarely used general supervisory authority" to review otherwise-final Court of A......
  • State v. Robinson
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 14 Agosto 2020
    ...statutory prohibition against appellate review of specific types of lower court orders or decisions. See, e.g. , State v. Todd , 369 N.C. 707, 709–10, 799 S.E.2d 834, 837 (2017) ; Ellis , 361 N.C. at 200, 639 S.E.2d at 425. As a result, this Court may well have had the authority to review J......
  • State v. McNeill
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 8 Junio 2018
    ...proper measure of attorney performance remains simply reasonableness under prevailing professional norms.’ " State v. Todd , 369 N.C. 707, 711, 799 S.E.2d 834, 837–38 (2017) (second alteration in original) (quoting Strickland 466 U.S. at 688, 104 S.Ct. at 2065, 80 L.Ed. 2d at 694 ). We have......
  • Get Started for Free