State v. Torres
Decision Date | 15 January 1998 |
Docket Number | No. 14279,14279 |
Citation | 47 Conn.App. 149,702 A.2d 142 |
Court | Connecticut Court of Appeals |
Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Victor TORRES. |
Susan M. Hankins, Assistant Public Defender, filed a brief for appellant (defendant).
John A. Connelly, State's Attorney, and Harry Weller and John Davenport, Assistant State's Attorneys, filed a brief for appellee (State).
Before LAVERY, LANDAU and SCHALLER, JJ.
This matter is currently before us on remand from our Supreme Court. State v. Torres, 242 Conn. 485, 698 A.2d 898 (1997). The defendant appealed to this court from a judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of conspiracy to commit murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 (a) 1 and 53a-54a (a). 2 A divided panel of this court reversed the trial court's judgment on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's guilty verdict. State v. Torres, 41 Conn.App. 495, 676 A.2d 871 (1996). Our Supreme Court granted the state's petition for certification, limited to the issue of whether the Appellate Court properly determined that the defendant's conviction was not supported by the evidence. State v. Torres, 239 Conn. 902, 682 A.2d 1012 (1996). Our Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Appellate Court, concluding that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the jury's verdict, and remanded the case for our consideration of the defendant's remaining claims. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly admitted evidence of his gang membership and leadership positions because (1) the prejudicial effect of that evidence outweighed its probative value, and (2) the admission of the evidence deprived him of his constitutionally protected rights under the Connecticut and United States constitutions to due process, a fair trial and freedom of association. 3
Our prior opinion describes the facts that the jury reasonably could have found. "The defendant was a 'regional commander' of a street gang known as the 'Latin Kings.' For several weeks, the defendant's gang was involved in an ongoing dispute with a rival gang known as 'Los Solidos.' In the afternoon hours of September 26, 1993, the Latin Kings conducted an emergency meeting at Morales' Cafe [in Waterbury] to discuss a recent incident in which a member of their gang was shot at by a member of the rival gang. During the meeting, Jose Martinez, a member of the gang and a witness for the state, served as a lookout. Although Martinez had attended nine prior gang meetings in which the defendant had been present, he did not attend the emergency meeting, nor did he know whether the defendant was there. At the meeting, the gang devised a plan to retaliate for the shooting incident by killing a member of Los Solidos.
State v. Torres, supra, 41 Conn.App. at 496-97, 676 A.2d 871.
The Supreme Court decision sets forth further facts that the jury reasonably could have found. "As a result of his investigation, Henderson learned that members of the Latin Kings had occupied various positions throughout Waterbury's south end on the evening of the shooting in order to implement the gang's plan to kill a Los Solidos gang member. Communication among the various locations was maintained through a CB channel on walkie-talkies, some of which Henderson subsequently retrieved. According to Martinez, [the state's key witness], the four other members of the Latin Kings assigned to the rooftop of the building on East Clay Street with Martinez were heavily armed with shotguns, handguns and automatic weapons. Martinez further testified that, while acting as a rooftop lookout, he had heard the defendant's voice, among others, broadcast over Velez' walkie-talkie. At approximately midnight, Velez, immediately after speaking with an unidentified person over his walkie-talkie, gave the order to fire at the victims.
"Martinez also testified that the defendant was located at 'sector one' at the time Martinez heard his voice over Velez' walkie-talkie, and that 'sector one' was Morales' Cafe in Waterbury, one of the locations where members of the Latin Kings had been stationed in connection with the implementation of the plan. Martinez further indicated that, after the emergency meeting at which the illegal scheme was approved, members of the Latin Kings who had attended that meeting reviewed the plan with those gang members who, like Martinez, already had taken their positions and, consequently, were not present at the meeting.
State v. Torres, supra, 242 Conn. at 492-93, 698 A.2d 898.
On the prosecutor's direct examination of Martinez, the defendant twice objected to questions regarding the defendant's membership in the Latin Kings, and the trial judge sustained both objections for lack of relevance. The prosecution then made an offer of proof after the jury was excused establishing, to the trial court's satisfaction, the relevance of the inquiry. 4 On direct examination, Martinez testified that the defendant was the "original commander" of the Latin Kings and that Martinez heard the defendant's voice on the walkie-talkie before the shootings occurred. The next witness, Henderson, also testified that the defendant was the regional commander of the Latin Kings.
The defendant claims that the trial court's admission of evidence relating to his gang membership and leadership positions violated the rules of evidence and the Connecticut and United States constitutions. The defendant first argues that the prejudicial effect of that evidence outweighed its probative value. The defendant next claims that the trial court's improper admission of the evidence violated his federal and state constitutional right to freedom of association. We address these claims in turn.
(Citations omitted; emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Cosby, 44 Conn.App. 26, 31-32, 687 A.2d 895 (1996), cert. denied, 240 Conn. 910, 689 A.2d 474 (1997).
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Harris
...of evidence of gang involvement not constitutional violation depriving defendant of fair trial); see also State v. Torres , 47 Conn. App. 149, 159, 702 A.2d 142 (1997), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 963, 707 A.2d 1267 (1998). Accordingly, we conclude that the prosecutor's comments about the defen......
-
State v. Crocker
...We conclude that the basis for the defendant's conviction was not that he was a member of the Island Brothers. See State v. Torres, 47 Conn. App. 149, 159, 702 A.2d 142 (1997), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 963, 707 A.2d 1267 C The defendant next claims that the court abused its discretion when i......
-
State v. Watson
...cert. denied, 240 Conn. 910, 689 A.2d 474 (1997)." (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Torres, 47 Conn.App. 149, 155-156, 702 A.2d 142 (1997). In State v. Ghere, supra, 201 Conn. at 300, 513 A.2d 1226, the defendant challenged "the propriety of the trial court......
-
Jackson v. State
...common design, purpose, or motive where victim was a rival gang member and was shot to death while selling drugs); State v. Torres, 47 Conn.App. 149, 702 A.2d 142 (1997) (evidence defendant was member and leader of gang was relevant in his conspiracy-to-commit-murder trial for shooting deat......