State v. Torres
Decision Date | 10 April 2019 |
Docket Number | SCWC-16-0000673 |
Parties | STATE of Hawai‘i, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rinaldo J. TORRES, Jr., Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | Hawaii Supreme Court |
Emmanuel G. Guerrero, Honolulu, for petitioner
Chad M. Kumagai, for respondent
Under our precedents, a defendant in a criminal case relinquishes fundamental constitutional rights only when the rights are knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived. To protect against the wrongful deprivation of these important rights, we require trial courts to conduct on-the-record colloquies prior to accepting such waivers, thereby ensuring that defendants understand the nature and consequences of their decisions and make their choices freely. We now reaffirm that the colloquy must be conducted so as to demonstrate that the waiver is a product of the defendant’s free will, undertaken in the absence of duress or other undue influence.
Our precedents also firmly establish that a defendant’s right to testify is of equal constitutional stature to the defendant’s corresponding right to refrain from testifying. Despite our recognition of this symmetry, our current procedures require that a trial court engage a defendant in an on-the-record colloquy only when the defendant waives the right to testify--and not when the defendant waives the reciprocal right not to testify.
We hold that, because the two constitutional rights are of equal importance, they should be afforded equal levels of protection. Accordingly, trial courts must engage the defendant in an on-the-record colloquy regarding the right to testify and to not testify when either right is waived, effectively making such a colloquy necessary in every trial. Because we apply our holding only prospectively, however, and the circumstances and strength of the evidence in this case render any error on the part of the trial court harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, we affirm the defendant’s convictions.
On August 27, 2014, a grand jury of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (circuit court) indicted Rinaldo J. Torres, Jr. on one count of robbery in the first degree in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 708-840(1)(b)(i) and/or 708-840(1)(b)(ii)1 and one count of terroristic threatening in the first degree in violation of HRS § 707-716(1)(e).2 At his arraignment, Torres entered pleas of not guilty.
Five days before trial was scheduled to begin, Torres submitted a Waiver of Indictment/Trial by Jury form to the court. The form stated "I, the above named defendant, charged with violation of the indicated statute have been advised of my rights," and it contained a box for the waiver of the right to an indictment and a box for the waiver of the right to a jury trial. Torres checked the box that said "I waive my right to trial by jury and consent to a trial by the COURT without a jury" and signed the bottom of the form.
The trial began on March 23, 2015.3 Before opening statements, the court indicated that defense counsel had communicated Torres’s desire to waive his right to a jury trial. The circuit court engaged in the following colloquy with Torres:
Prior to trial commencing, the court did not advise Torres of his right to testify or of his right not to testify.
The State first called Satoshi Tokunaga who testified that he was visiting from Japan in the summer of 2014 when the incident with Torres occurred. He explained that on July 18, 2014, while he was sitting on a bench in the Waikiki Shopping Plaza, a stranger approached him with a gun and pointed it at his head. Tokunaga testified that the man hit him, he hit the man back, and the man unsuccessfully attempted to take his bag. During the incident, Tokunaga said, they were hitting each other and eventually the individual’s gun fell to the floor and both of them tried to grab it. Tokunaga stated that after the man retrieved the gun, the man walked toward the nearby escalator, security arrived, and the incident ended.4
Tokunaga testified that after the incident, he spoke with detectives and identified a person in a photo lineup that "show[ed] the face of the suspect" and that looked like the stranger who had approached him. Tokunaga was also shown a series of videos during his testimony that depicted the events as he had described. Tokunaga identified the person in the videos as the person that approached him. Tokunaga then made an in-court identification of Torres as the person that assaulted him.
Elliot Aki, a security guard who responded to the incident at the shopping plaza, testified that when he arrived at the scene he saw one person "breaking away" from a group of people and starting to leave. He explained that he began pursuing this person because "this individual might have been the instigator" of the incident. Aki said that the pursuit continued to the escalator and when he came close, the person "pivoted towards his right and pulled out this black object" that "looked like a firearm" and pointed it at him. Aki explained that he then turned around and ran back up the escalator and warned others in the area that the person on the escalator had a gun. Aki said that he observed the individual continue down the escalator in a rushed manner with "his hands in the air with the weapon." Aki was shown the security camera video of the incident on the escalator, and he described the events again as the video was being played.
Prior to Torres being called as a witness, the court did not engage in a colloquy with Torres regarding his right to testify or his right not to testify.
Torres testified that he was at the shopping plaza on July 18, 2014, and that he approached Tokunaga and offered to sell him marijuana. Torres explained that when he opened the bag of marijuana in front of Tokunaga’s face, Tokunaga grabbed him and punched him in the eye.5 After he fell to the ground and stood back up, an altercation ensued, Torres testified. Torres admitted that he had a pellet gun on the day of the incident but said that it was in his bag and he never held it in the confrontation with Tokunaga. He testified that the pellet gun likely fell out of his bag when he fell to the floor. Torres also stated that the pellet gun’s magazine, which was found on the ground at the scene, was never loaded in the pellet gun.
When security arrived, Torres testified that he picked up the pellet gun and his bag, and he walked away from the scene still holding his pellet gun at his side as he approached the escalator. Torres testified that while he was on the escalator, he tried to put the pellet gun in his pocket but it fell to the ground as he turned to look behind him. Torres acknowledged that the person in the video "look[ed] like [him]" and that he had the pellet gun out while going down the escalator, but he denied that he pointed it at anyone. After Torres’s testimony, the defense rested.
The circuit court found Torres guilty of both counts.6 Torres was sentenced to 20 years imprisonment for...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hawaiiusa Fed. Credit Union v. Monalim
...See, e.g., Chen v. Mah, 146 Hawai‘i 157, 177, 457 P.3d 796, 816 (2020) (applying a holding prospectively); State v. Torres, 144 Hawai‘i 282, 295, 439 P.3d 234, 247 (2019) (same); State by Office of Consumer Prot. v. Joshua, 141 Hawai‘i 91, 98-99, 405 P.3d 527, 534-35 (2017) (same); State v.......
-
State v. Chang
...that the Lewis advisement include that the decision not to testify cannot be used against the defendant); State v. Torres, 144 Hawai‘i 282, 294, 439 P.3d 234, 246 (2019) (extending Tachibana to also encompass the right not to testify).As the facts of this case demonstrate, this presents a p......
-
State v. Lavoie
...142 Hawai‘i 390, 402, 420 P.3d 321, 333 (2018) ; State v. Wilson, 144 Hawai‘i 454, 465, 445 P.3d 35, 46 (2019) ; State v. Torres, 144 Hawai‘i 282, 291, 439 P.3d 234, 243 (2019).This is not a case "[w]here there is a wealth of overwhelming and compelling evidence tending to" disprove the def......
-
State v. Domut
...trial as a fundamental right that cannot be relinquished absent a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver. State v. Torres, 144 Hawai‘i 282, 288, 439 P.3d 234, 240 (2019). While a defendant may waive the right to a jury trial, the waiver must be made knowingly, intelligently, and volunta......