State v. Vader
| Citation | 276 A.2d 151,114 N.J.Super. 260 |
| Parties | STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George VADER, Jr., Defendant-Respondent. |
| Decision Date | 29 March 1971 |
| Court | New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division |
Michael R. Justin, Asst. Deputy Public Defender, for appellant (Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).
Barnett E. Hoffman, Asst. Prosecutor, for respondent (Clinton E. Cronin, Acting Prosecutor of Middlesex County, attorney).
Before Judges SULLIVAN, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
SULLIVAN, P.J.A.D.
In this murder-arson case the State, pursuant to leave granted, appeals from a pretrial decision of the trial court excluding all evidence relating to a January 6, 1970 inspection of fire-damaged premises by Detective Knelle and Dr. David Von Ludwig, including photographs taken at the time.
The case arises out of a fire which occurred on January 2, 1970 in a dwelling house occupied by defendant and his family in Highland Park, New Jersey. As a result of the fire and smoke damage, the house was rendered uninhabitable. Doors and windows were broken and all utilities were cut off. Defendant's child Susan, who was in the house at the time of the fire, was overcome by smoke and died the next day.
The authorities were suspicious of the fire and, on January 3, 1970, obtained a warrant to search the house which was executed the same day. An inspection of the property was made, photographs taken and certain items confiscated. A return was made of the warrant on January 5, 1970. Also on January 5, 1970 the prosecutor's office communicated with Dr. David Von Ludwig of New York, an outstanding expert in the field of arson. Dr. Von Ludwig visited the Highland Park property on January 6, 1970 in the company of Detective Knelle, made an inspection of the house and took photographs. Defendant was subsequently indicted for murder and arson.
Prior to trial defendant moved to suppress all evidence relating to the inspection made on January 6, 1970. The motion was originally denied by the trial court. Thereafter, the court reconsidered its ruling when its attention was called to State v. Parsons, 83 N.J.Super. 430, 200 A.2d 340 (App.Div.1964). Based on Parsons the court changed its ruling and held that the January 6 inspection was an illegal search. The court held that the January 3 search warrant could not support the January 6 'search' since the warrant had been executed on January 3 and there may not be more than one search under a warrant.
We conclude that the police investigation as to the cause of this fire did not constitute a search within...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Tyler, 18
...30 Wash & Lee L.Rev. 133, 145, fn. 86 (1973).26 State v. Murdock, 160 Mont. 95, 500 P.2d 387, 391 (1972).27 State v. Vader, 114 N.J.Super. 260, 276 A.2d 151 (1971).28 State v. Felger, 19 Or.App. 39, 526 P.2d 611, 615 (1974): 'We need not decide whether a warrant was necessary for these subs......
-
State v. Felger
...People v. Tyler, 50 Mich.App. 414, 213 N.W.2d 221 (1973); People v. Bailey, 42 Mich.App. 359, 202 N.W.2d 557 (1972); State v. Vader, 114 N.J.Super. 260, 276 A.2d 151 (1971); Bennett v. Commonwealth, 212 Va. 863, 188 S.E.2d 215 (1972). Contra: State v. Buxton, 238 Ind. 93, 148 N.E.2d 547 (19......
-
State v. Hansen
...whether reasonable expectations of privacy exist. See State v. Murdock, 160 Mont. 95, 500 P.2d 387 (1972); State v. Vader, 114 N.J.Super. 260, 276 A.2d 151 (1971); People v. Calhoun, 90 Misc.2d 88, 393 N.Y.S.2d 529 (1977). This position seems to us to be unduly narrow and not representative......
-
People v. Dajnowicz
...the recognized exceptions to the rule that a search warrant is necessary. The final case that must be discussed in State v. Vader, 114 N.J.Super. 260, 276 A.2d 151 (1971). The facts in Vader indicate that a residential fire on January 2, 1970 rendered a dwelling uninhabitable and caused the......