State v. Vandeusen

CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
CitationState v. Vandeusen, 320 Conn. 903, 127 A.3d 187 (Conn. 2015)
Decision Date09 December 2015
Parties STATE of Connecticut v. Sara E. VANDEUSEN.

Pamela S. Nagy, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Timothy F. Costello, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 160 Conn.App. 815, 126 A.3d 604 (2015), is denied.

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • State Conn. v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • May 10, 2016
    ...a favorable position for the principal to act. See State v. VanDeusen, 160 Conn. App. 815, 832-33, 126 A.3d 604, cert. denied, 320 Conn. 903, 127 A.3d 187 (2015); State v. Scheck, 106 Conn. App. 81, 85-87, 940 A.2d 871, cert. denied, 286 Conn. 918, 945 A.2d 979 (2008). 14. Our Supreme Court......
  • Vandeusen v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • May 10, 2022
    ...added; footnote in original; footnotes omitted.) State v. VanDeusen , 160 Conn. App. 815, 818–21, 126 A.3d 604, cert. denied, 320 Conn. 903, 127 A.3d 187 (2015).On direct appeal, the petitioner claimed "that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction of conspiracy and attem......
  • State v. Dijmarescu
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • May 22, 2018
    ...815, 826, 126 A.3d 604 (jury may properly infer that defendant intended natural consequences of his actions), cert. denied, 320 Conn. 903, 127 A.3d 187 (2015).In sum, considering the testimony of L, Chesworth, and Coleman, there was overwhelming evidence that the defendant intended to cause......
  • State v. Chemlen
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • May 31, 2016
    ...omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. VanDeusen, 160 Conn. App. 815, 822-23, 126 A.3d 604, cert. denied, 320 Conn. 903, 127 A.3d 187 (2015). In viewing the evidence, "[i]f [inadmissible] evidence is received without objection, it becomes part of the evidence in the case, and ......
  • Get Started for Free