State v. Varney, 7565
| Decision Date | 28 February 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 7565,7565 |
| Citation | 117 N.H. 163,370 A.2d 289 |
| Parties | STATE of New Hampshire v. Michael A. VARNEY. |
| Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Defendant was charged with the offense of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of RSA 262-A:62 (Supp.1975). Defendant moved to suppress the results of a blood test sample of 0.17 percent alcohol by weight because of a twelve-day delay from the date the sample was taken to the date the sample was analyzed by the state police laboratory. This delay is asserted to violate RSA 262-A:69-i (Supp.1975).
The chemist who performed the analysis of the sample testified that any deterioration would have worked to the defendant's favor, not the state's. Because the timing of delivery of the blood sample to the state laboratory for analysis is 'not part of the procedure for conducting the chemical test,' the defendant may not take advantage of the provision for exclusion of evidence pursuant to RSA 262-A:69-i (Supp.1975). State v. Paul, 116 N.H. 252, 356 A.2d 661 (1976); State v. Groulx, 109 N.H. 281, 249 A.2d 690 (1969). To the extent the twelve-day delay has any effect on the evidence it would relate to its weight and not its admissibility. State v. Gallant, 108 N.H. 72, 73-75, 227 A.2d 597, 598-99 (1967); State v. LaFountain, 108 N.H. 219, 231 A.2d 635 (1967).
This case raises no new or important question for this court. See State v. Miller, 117 N.H. --, 369 A.2d 197 (1977). The transferring of questions such as herein raised by district and municipal courts pursuant to RSA 502-A:17-a (Supp.1975) on interlocutory matters should not be encouraged. See, e.g., RSA 491:App.R. 88 (Supp.1975).
Denial of defendant's motion affirmed; remanded.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Van Wie
...public health?" At the outset we note that these misdemeanor cases present new and important questions for this court, State v. Varney, 117 N.H. ---, 370 A.2d 289 (1977), and, therefore, "exceptional circumstances" exist under the test set out in State v. Doyle, 117 N.H. ---, 378 A.2d 1379 ......
- Grant v. Town of Newton
-
State v. Goff, 78-111
...or municipal courts except in exceptional circumstances. State v. Doyle, 117 N.H. ---, 378 A.2d 1379 (1977). See also State v. Varney, 117 N.H. 163, 370 A.2d 289 (1977). In conformance with the trial court's request, defense counsel subsequently produced the defendant for a trial on the mer......
-
Hudson v. Dir., N.H. Div. of Motor Vehicles
...116 N.H. 252, 253–54, 356 A.2d 661 (1976), there was a twelve-day delay between obtaining and testing the sample, State v. Varney, 117 N.H. 163, 164, 370 A.2d 289 (1977), or the sample was taken by a person not specifically permitted to do so by the statute, Groulx, 109 N.H. at 281–83, 249 ......