State v. Walker, 64916

Decision Date20 December 1984
Docket NumberNo. 64916,64916
Citation461 So.2d 108
PartiesSTATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Carolyn WALKER, Appellee.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Appeal from District Court of Appeal, Second District Statutory or Constitutional Invalidity; Case No. 83-1047.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender and Robert J. Lancaster, Asst. Public Defender, Sixth Judicial Circuit, Clearwater, for appellee.

ADKINS, Judge.

Affirmed.

We adopt the opinion of Judge Grimes in State v. Walker, 444 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

ALDERMAN, J., dissents.

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • State v. Adkins, SC11–1878.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 12, 2012
    ...items for noncriminal purposes. See State v. Saiez, 489 So.2d 1125 (Fla.1986); State v. Walker, 444 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA), aff'd,461 So.2d 108 (Fla.1984) (adopting district court of appeal's opinion); Delmonico v. State, 155 So.2d 368 (Fla.1963). The provisions of chapter 893 at issue in......
  • Sult v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • June 23, 2005
    ...of government to intrude upon individual rights and liberties." State v. Walker, 444 So.2d 1137, 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984),adopted, 461 So.2d 108 (Fla.1984). Thus, it is impossible to say that the ordinance bears a reasonable relation to a permissible legislative objective and is not discrimi......
  • Wyche v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • March 25, 1993
    ...power of government to intrude upon individual rights and liberties." State v. Walker, 444 So.2d 1137, 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA), adopted, 461 So.2d 108 (Fla.1984). Thus, it is impossible to say that the ordinance bears a reasonable relation to a permissible legislative objective and is not discri......
  • D.P. v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 10, 1997
    ...county's legitimate objective in protecting property from graffiti. See State v. Walker, 444 So.2d 1137, 1140 (Fla. 2d DCA), aff'd, 461 So.2d 108 (Fla.1984) (where then Judge Grimes succinctly stated: "Without evidence of criminal behavior, the prohibition of this conduct lacks any rational......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT