State v. Wasserman
| Decision Date | 18 March 1963 |
| Docket Number | No. A--94,A--94 |
| Citation | State v. Wasserman, 189 A.2d 218, 39 N.J. 516 (N.J. 1963) |
| Parties | STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Faye WASSERMAN, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Gerold Kanengiser, Jersey City, for defendant-appellant.
William A. O'Brien, Jersey City, for plaintiff-respondent(Frank A. Verga, Jersey City, attorney).
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Lewis in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance: Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN--7.
For reversal: None.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
15 cases
-
State v. Reyes
...The standard was essentially repeated in State v. Wasserman, 75 N.J.Super. 480, 485, 183 A.2d 467 (App.Div.1962) aff'd o.b. 39 N.J. 516, 189 A.2d 218 (1963): ... the trial judge was only required to have had reasons to believe the violation charges were true in order to justify the It appea......
-
Sees v. Baber
...parents and the welfare of the child. State v. Wasserman, 75 N.J.Super. 480, 489, 183 A.2d 467 (App.Div.1962), aff'd o. b. 39 N.J. 516, 189 A.2d 218 (1963). There is no question that the obverse, the private direct placement of children for adoption, is very much disfavored. Under our statu......
-
State v. Laws
...its discretionary sentencing power. See State v. Wasserman, 75 N.J.Super. 480, 485, 183 A.2d 467 (App.Div.1962), affirmed 39 N.J. 516, 189 A.2d 218 (1963); State v. Gibbs, 79 N.J.Super. 315, 324--326, 191 A.2d 495 (App.Div.1963); State v. Furino, 85 N.J.Super. 345, 349, 204 A.2d 718 (App.Di......
-
State v. Mosley
...(quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:45–3(a)(4) ); cf. State v. Wasserman, 75 N.J. Super. 480, 484–85, 183 A.2d 467 (App. Div. 1962), aff'd, 39 N.J. 516, 189 A.2d 218 (1963) (recognizing, pre-Code, that proof of commission of new offense is basis for revocation of probation).Provisions governing probation ......
Get Started for Free