State v. West End Light & Power Co.
Decision Date | 10 December 1912 |
Parties | STATE, on Inf. of JONES, Circuit Attorney, v. WEST END LIGHT & POWER CO. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Information by the State of Missouri, on the relation of Seebert G. Jones, Circuit Attorney, in the nature of quo warranto, against the West End Light & Power Company. From a judgment for respondent, plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded, with directions that judgment of ouster be entered.
Seebert G. Jones and Jones, Jones, Hocker & Davis, Jeptha D. Howe, and Forrest G. Ferriss, all of St. Louis, Elliott W. Major, of Jefferson City (Lon O. Hocker and B. Schnurmacher, both of St. Lopis, of counsel), for appellant. Watts, Williams & Dines and Lyon & Swarts, all of St. Louis, for respondent.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis in favor of respondent in a proceeding by information in the nature of quo warranto. The information was filed in said court at the June term, 1909, by the circuit attorney of said city against the respondent corporation, the West End Light & Power Company. The purpose of the suit was to oust the respondent from exercising the franchise of using the streets of said city for the erection of poles and stringing of wires thereon, to be used in conducting the business of supplying electricity to the public for lighting and other purposes. An amended information was afterwards filed, to which the respondent in due time filed an answer and return. Thereupon plaintiff filed a reply and the respondent filed a supplemental answer and return, and, upon the issues thus framed, a trial was had and judgment entered as above. Plaintiff appealed to this court.
The pleadings cover 47 pages of the printed record, and are of too great length to be set out in this statement. In the view we take of the case, the material facts, as gathered from the pleadings are, briefly, as follows:
The information charges the respondent with claiming and exercising the franchise of using the streets and public places of the city of St. Louis for the erection of poles and stringing of wires thereon, for the purpose of supplying the public with electricity, without first having obtained authority by ordinance from the city so to do, and prays the court to cause the defendant to answer and state by what warrant of authority it claims to have, use and enjoy such franchise; that a judgment of ouster be rendered against respondent, ousting it from the exercise of such franchise. In its return to the information the respondent alleges that the city of St. Louis on the 15th day of March, 1884, being authorized by its charter, duly enacted Ordinance No. 12723. That ordinance, which is filed as an exhibit and made a part of the return, is in part as follows:
It is further alleged: That on the 14th day of February, 1885, while the said ordinance was in full force and effect, Browning, King & Co., a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex Inf. McKittrick v. Mo. Utilities Co., 34073.
...be brought at the relation of the city of California. State ex inf. v. Mo. Util. Co., 53 S.W. (2d) 394, 331 Mo. 337; State ex inf. v. West End L. & P. Co., 246 Mo. 653; Kavanaugh v. St. Louis, 220 Mo. 517; State ex inf. v. Ry. Co., 140 Mo. 539; State ex inf. Atty. Gen. ex rel. City of Leban......
-
State ex Inf. McKittrick v. Mo. Pub. Serv. Corp., 36189.
... ... Sikeston v. Mo. Utilities Co., 53 S.W. (2d) 394, 331 Mo. 337; State ex inf. Jones v. West End L. & P. Co., 152 S.W. 76, 246 Mo. 653; State ex rel. Kansas City v. Ry. Co., 41 S.W. 955, 140 ... because, when the ordinance granting such franchise was passed, the city council was without power to grant an electric franchise. Special Charter, Laws, 1871, 478; Secs. 951, 952, R.S. 1879; City f Carthage v. Carthage Light Co., 97 Mo. App. 20, 70 S.W. 936; State ex rel. City of Springfield v. Springfield Water Co., 131 ... ...
-
State ex inf. McKittrick ex rel. City of California v. Missouri Utilities Co.
... ... State ex ... inf. v. Mo. Util. Co., 53 S.W.2d 394, 331 Mo. 337; State ex ... inf. v. West End L. & P. Co., 246 Mo. 653; Kavanaugh v. St ... Louis, 220 Mo. 517; State ex inf. v. Ry. Co., ... The respondent says that its bondholders are ... necessary parties. The Community Power & Light Company, which ... owns all of respondent's common stock except ... director's qualifying ... ...
-
Union Elec. Co. v. City of St. Charles
... ... 394; American Mfg. Co. v. St ... Louis, 192 S.W. 399; State ex rel. American Mfg. Co ... v. Reynolds, 270 Mo. 589, 194 S.W. 878. (2) ... specially named in the statute delegating to such cities ... power to impose such taxes. The tax purportedly levied by the ... ordinance is ... class to tax the businesses of "light and power ... companies" does not authorize the taxing of persons ... 6293, XVI and XVII, R.S. 1939; ... State ex inf. Jones v. West End L. & P. Co., 246 Mo ... 653; St. Louis v. Laclede Gas Light Co., 155 ... ...