State v. William
Decision Date | 27 September 2005 |
Docket Number | No. S52675.,S52675. |
Citation | 122 P.3d 64,339 Or. 406 |
Parties | STATE v. WILLIAM. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Petition for review denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial6 cases
-
State v. Copeland
...* * * to have constituted an exception to the confrontation rights guarantee.’ ” Id. at 367, 270 P.3d 313 (quoting State v. William, 199 Or.App. 191, 197, 110 P.3d 1114,rev. den.,339 Or. 406, 122 P.3d 64 (2005)). The court then noted that, in this case, defendant had acknowledged that some ......
-
State v. Copeland
...as a public record, the proof of service falls within a “historical exception” to Article I, section 11. See, e.g., State v. William, 199 Or.App. 191, 110 P.3d 1114, rev. den., 339 Or. 406, 122 P.3d 64 (2005). Accordingly, the trial court did not err in admitting the proof of service, and w......
-
State v. Norman, 030343136; A122051.
...in State v. Campbell, 299 Or. 633, 705 P.2d 694 (1985), and State v. Moore, 334 Or. 328, 49 P.3d 785 (2002). But in State v. William, 199 Or.App. 191, 193-97, 110 P.3d 1114, rev. den., 339 Or. 406, 122 P.3d 64 (2005), we adhered to our holding in Conway regarding Article I, section 11, in t......
-
State v. Tryon
...concession, on appeal, that the return of service was properly admitted as a public record under OEC 803(8)(b). See State v. William, 199 Or.App. 191, 197, 110 P.3d 1114, rev. den., 339 Or. 406, 122 P.3d 64 (2005) (holding that admission of Intoxilyzer certificates under OEC 803(8)(b) witho......
Request a trial to view additional results