State v. Williams, No. COA01-1400.

Docket NºNo. COA01-1400.
Citation568 S.E.2d 890, 153 NC App. 192
Case DateSeptember 17, 2002
CourtCourt of Appeal of North Carolina (US)

568 S.E.2d 890
153 NC App.
192

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Chris WILLIAMS

No. COA01-1400.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 17, 2002.


568 S.E.2d 891
Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Mary Penny Thompson, for the State/Appellee

Paul Pooley, Durham, for Defendant/Appellant.

TYSON, Judge.

Chris Williams ("defendant") appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of assault on a female and felonious habitual misdemeanor assault. We vacate defendant's conviction of felonious habitual misdemeanor assault because a special accompanying indictment was required and not rendered. We remand for entry of judgment on defendant's conviction of assault on a female.

I. Facts

The State's evidence tended to show that on 28 July 2000, defendant appeared at the home of Jennifer Bacon at 9:00 a.m. He knocked at her door and asked for a cigarette. Ms. Bacon knew defendant as she often saw him at the local Citgo convenience store where she would speak to him and give him cigarettes or spare change. Ms. Bacon agreed to give defendant a cigarette.

While Ms. Bacon went to get a cigarette, defendant stepped into her home. According to Ms. Bacon, defendant proposed that he and Ms. Bacon engage in sexual intercourse. Ms. Bacon testified that defendant then assaulted her by wrapping his arms around her, kissing her cheek and grabbing her buttocks. Defendant testified and denied these allegations stating that he did not have the chance to do anything because Ms. Bacon shoved him out the door.

Ms. Bacon reported the incident to the police later that day, and defendant was questioned. Defendant was indicted on 16 October 2000, and a warrant for his arrest was issued the same day.

A bifurcated trial was held for the State to initially prove the crime of assault on a female and subsequently to prove the felony of habitual misdemeanor assault. While giving the jury a summary of the case before the trial for assault on a female, the judge characterized the charge as "feloniously assaulting Jennifer Bacon, a female, by kissing her on the cheek and grabbing her by the buttocks against her will, he then [a] male being over 18." At the close of evidence, the court instructed the jury on the elements of assault on a female. The jury rendered a guilty verdict.

The trial then moved to the felony of habitual misdemeanor assault phase. An assistant county clerk of court testified that defendant had been convicted of second degree trespass and resisting arrest on 13 March 1997 as well as assault on a government official on 15 October 1992. She further attested to defendant's guilty pleas of (1) disorderly conduct on 27 May 1993, (2) second degree trespass on 11 January 1994, and (3) simple assault on 18 June 1992. A probation

568 S.E.2d 892
officer's testimony connected defendant to the certified judgments already in evidence. The court instructed the jury on the felony of habitual misdemeanor assault. The jury returned a verdict of guilty on that charge. Defendant appeals

II. Issues

Defendant assigns as error that the trial court: (1) lacked jurisdiction to sentence defendant for felonious habitual misdemeanor assault where the indictment only charged assault on a female and (2) erred under N.C.G.S. § 15A-1213 in describing the offense with which defendant was charged as "felonious assault".

III. Jurisdiction

Defendant contends that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to sentence him for the felony of habitual misdemeanor assault where the indictment only charged assault on a female. Defendant argues that this discrepancy makes the indictment invalid, and that an invalid indictment robs the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 practice notes
  • State v. Brice, No. 244PA16
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • November 3, 2017
    ...the indictment requirements set out in N.C.G.S. § 15A-928(b) had been held to be jurisdictional in State v. Williams , 153 N.C. App. 192, 568 S.E.2d 890 (2002), disc. rev. improvidently allowed , 357 N.C. 45, 577 S.E.2d 618 (2003) (per curiam). Id. at ––––, 786 S.E.2d at 815. As a result, s......
  • State Of North Carolina v. Rawls, No. COA09-1029.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • October 19, 2010
    ...appellate review.”), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1052, 125 S.Ct. 2299, 161 L.Ed.2d 1094 (2005); State v. Williams, 153 N.C.App. 192, 195-96, 568 S.E.2d 890, 892-93 (holding issue not reviewable by Court when defendant failed to preserve error at trial and did not specifically and distinctly asse......
  • State v. Aiken, No. COA06-1456 (N.C. App. 8/7/2007), No. COA06-1456
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • August 7, 2007
    ...N.C.R. App. P. 10(a); see also State v. McNeil, 350 N.C. 657, 681, 518 S.E.2d 486, 501 (1999); State v. Williams, 153 N.C. App. 192, 196, 568 S.E.2d 890, 893 (2002); N.C.R. App. P. 10(c)(4) (noting that a question not preserved by objection at trial may be made the basis of an assignment of......
  • State v. Overby, No. COA06-384 (N.C. App. 5/1/2007), No. COA06-384
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • May 1, 2007
    ...this Court. See State v. McNeil, 350 N.C. 657, 681, 518 S.E.2d 486, 501 (1999); see also State v. Williams, 153 N.C. App. 192, 196, 568 S.E.2d 890, 893 (2002); State v. Jones, 147 N.C. App. 527, 543, 556 S.E.2d 644, 654 (2001); N.C. R. App. P. 10(c)(4) (2006) (noting that a question not pre......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
15 cases
  • State v. Brice, No. 244PA16
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • November 3, 2017
    ...the indictment requirements set out in N.C.G.S. § 15A-928(b) had been held to be jurisdictional in State v. Williams , 153 N.C. App. 192, 568 S.E.2d 890 (2002), disc. rev. improvidently allowed , 357 N.C. 45, 577 S.E.2d 618 (2003) (per curiam). Id. at ––––, 786 S.E.2d at 815. As a result, s......
  • State Of North Carolina v. Rawls, No. COA09-1029.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • October 19, 2010
    ...appellate review.”), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1052, 125 S.Ct. 2299, 161 L.Ed.2d 1094 (2005); State v. Williams, 153 N.C.App. 192, 195-96, 568 S.E.2d 890, 892-93 (holding issue not reviewable by Court when defendant failed to preserve error at trial and did not specifically and distinctly asse......
  • State v. Aiken, No. COA06-1456 (N.C. App. 8/7/2007), No. COA06-1456
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • August 7, 2007
    ...N.C.R. App. P. 10(a); see also State v. McNeil, 350 N.C. 657, 681, 518 S.E.2d 486, 501 (1999); State v. Williams, 153 N.C. App. 192, 196, 568 S.E.2d 890, 893 (2002); N.C.R. App. P. 10(c)(4) (noting that a question not preserved by objection at trial may be made the basis of an assignment of......
  • State v. Overby, No. COA06-384 (N.C. App. 5/1/2007), No. COA06-384
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • May 1, 2007
    ...this Court. See State v. McNeil, 350 N.C. 657, 681, 518 S.E.2d 486, 501 (1999); see also State v. Williams, 153 N.C. App. 192, 196, 568 S.E.2d 890, 893 (2002); State v. Jones, 147 N.C. App. 527, 543, 556 S.E.2d 644, 654 (2001); N.C. R. App. P. 10(c)(4) (2006) (noting that a question not pre......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT