State v. Williamson, No. 46108
| Court | Court of Appeal of Missouri (US) |
| Writing for the Court | CRIST; CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD |
| Citation | 657 S.W.2d 311 |
| Parties | STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jewell WILLIAMSON, Appellant. |
| Docket Number | No. 46108 |
| Decision Date | 19 July 1983 |
Page 311
v.
Jewell WILLIAMSON, Appellant.
Eastern District,
Division Three.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to
Supreme Court Denied
Sept. 1, 1983.
Page 312
Murry A. Marks, Clayton, for appellant.
John Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Kristie Green, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, George Westfall, Pros. Atty., Clayton, for respondent.
CRIST, Judge.
Defendant appeals from a jury verdict convicting him of second degree murder, § 565.004, RSMo.1978. The trial court sentenced defendant in accord with the jury's recommendation to 30 years imprisonment. We affirm.
In reviewing defendant's claim of insufficient evidence to support his conviction of second degree murder, we look to the evidence in favor of the jury's verdict and disregard defendant's evidence except to the extent it supports the jury's finding. State v. Baldwin, 571 S.W.2d 236, 239 (Mo. banc 1978). The state establishes second degree murder by proving beyond a reasonable doubt the killing was unlawful, premeditated, with malice aforethought but without deliberation. Section 565.004; see, State v. McGowan, 621 S.W.2d 557, 559 (Mo.App.1981).
Malice may constitutionally be presumed from a killing accomplished by use of a deadly weapon upon a vital part of the body. Thompson v. State, 576 S.W.2d 541, 547 (Mo.App.1978). Premeditation need exist but for a moment only. State v. Williams, 545 S.W.2d 342, 344 (Mo.App.1976). An assault where a deadly weapon is used in such a way as will naturally, probably or reasonably produce death or jeopardize life gives rise to a presumption of an intent to kill. State v. Goforth, 535 S.W.2d 464, 466 (Mo.App.1976). Evidence of defendant's flight or attempts to conceal the crime may be considered by the jury as evidence tending to show a consciousness of guilt. Id.
On the evening of January 17, 1981, James Treacy, the victim, and Raymond Franklyn were passengers in a car driven by Steve Eckenrod. Franklyn sat on the right side of the rear seat, immediately behind the victim seated on the front passenger's seat.
As the three traveled north on Lucas and Hunt Road, a car exited Interstate 70 at a high rate of speed, failed to yield, and nearly collided with the Eckenrod vehicle. Eckenrod swerved and missed the car, driven by defendant. Defendant's car then pulled parallel with Eckenrod's car, approaching on the passenger side. Victim noticed defendant's window rolled down and defendant reportedly asked, "Do you have a problem, boy?" Victim responded, "Yes, nigger, I'll shove this fucking beer bottle up your ass, nigger." Franklyn testified he observed defendant look straight, then turn to his left to look at victim, point a revolver and fire. Defendant appeared to Franklyn to have his teeth gritted and to be angry.
Eckenrod testified the victim did not move his arms or hands or make any menacing gesture toward defendant prior...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Williamson v. Jones, No. 90-1093
...Sec. 565.004 (1978), and thereafter sentenced to thirty years imprisonment. On appeal, his conviction was affirmed. State v. Williamson, 657 S.W.2d 311 (Mo.Ct.App.1983). Appellant filed a federal habeas petition with the United States District Court, which was dismissed without prejudice be......
-
State v. Akers, No. WD
...not prove a murder willful and premeditated. To prove murder, the premeditation need exist but for a moment only. State v. Williamson, 657 S.W.2d 311, 312[3-6] (Mo.App.1983). In the context of § 565.004, then extant and under which Akers was charged, premeditation means " 'thought of before......
-
State v. Liggins, No. 51038
...the killing was done by defendant and was unlawful, premeditated, with malice aforethought but without deliberation. State v. Williamson, 657 S.W.2d 311 (Mo.App.1983) [1, 2]. Malice may be presumed from a killing accomplished by use of a deadly weapon upon a vital part of the body. Id. An a......
-
State v. Singleton, No. 48677
...from the assault with a deadly weapon in such a manner as to naturally, probably or reasonably produce death. See State v. Williamson, 657 S.W.2d 311, 312 (Mo.App.1983). "Premeditation need exist but for a moment only." Id. Here, appellant premeditated within the meaning of second degree mu......
-
Williamson v. Jones, No. 90-1093
...Sec. 565.004 (1978), and thereafter sentenced to thirty years imprisonment. On appeal, his conviction was affirmed. State v. Williamson, 657 S.W.2d 311 (Mo.Ct.App.1983). Appellant filed a federal habeas petition with the United States District Court, which was dismissed without prejudice be......
-
State v. Akers, No. WD
...not prove a murder willful and premeditated. To prove murder, the premeditation need exist but for a moment only. State v. Williamson, 657 S.W.2d 311, 312[3-6] (Mo.App.1983). In the context of § 565.004, then extant and under which Akers was charged, premeditation means " 'thought of before......
-
State v. Liggins, No. 51038
...the killing was done by defendant and was unlawful, premeditated, with malice aforethought but without deliberation. State v. Williamson, 657 S.W.2d 311 (Mo.App.1983) [1, 2]. Malice may be presumed from a killing accomplished by use of a deadly weapon upon a vital part of the body. Id. An a......
-
State v. Singleton, No. 48677
...from the assault with a deadly weapon in such a manner as to naturally, probably or reasonably produce death. See State v. Williamson, 657 S.W.2d 311, 312 (Mo.App.1983). "Premeditation need exist but for a moment only." Id. Here, appellant premeditated within the meaning of second degree mu......