State v. Wilson, Cr. N

Decision Date18 January 1990
Docket NumberCr. N
Citation450 N.W.2d 422
PartiesSTATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Donald WILSON, Defendant and Appellant. o. 890179.
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

Appeal from the District Court for Mercer County, South Central Judicial District; William F. Hodny, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Carpenter Offices, Bismarck, for defendant and appellant; argued by Deborah Carpenter.

Alan Keith Duppler, State's Atty., Stanton, for plaintiff and appellee.

GIERKE, Justice.

Donald Earl Wilson (Wilson) raises two issues on appeal from a district court jury verdict which found him guilty of a delivery of a controlled substance. We affirm.

Initially, Wilson contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict. We find that there was substantial evidence to support the jury's verdict and, accordingly, with regard to this issue, affirm pursuant to Rule 35.1(a)(3), N.D.R.App.P.

Wilson's second contention is that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. The allegations of ineffectiveness on the part of Wilson's counsel, failure to cross-examine certain witnesses and failure to include jury instructions on lesser included offenses, may well have involved trial tactics. The record is devoid of any indication as to what testimony would have been adduced through cross-examination or what effect, if any, different jury instructions may have had on the outcome of Wilson's trial. Therefore, we are unable to determine whether Wilson was rendered effective assistance of counsel. In this case, it would be more appropriate for Wilson to seek relief in a post-conviction relief proceeding pursuant to Chapter 29-32.1, N.D.C.C., where both parties would have the opportunity to fully develop a record. Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice with the understanding that Wilson may raise the ineffective assistance of counsel issue at a proceeding for post-conviction relief pursuant to Chapter 29-32.1, N.D.C.C. State v. Ricehill, 415 N.W.2d 481, 484 (N.D.1987).

ERICKSTAD, C.J., and VANDE WALLE, LEVINE and MESCHKE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • State v. Wilson, Cr. N
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Dakota
    • July 28, 1992
    ...We affirm. This is the third time that Wilson has appealed to this Court. State v. Wilson, 466 N.W.2d 101 (N.D.1991); State v. Wilson, 450 N.W.2d 422 (N.D.1990). This appeal follows a new trial, which was held in Mercer County on September 18, On January 23, 1989, Linda Keller, a police inf......
  • State v. Antoine, 960364
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Dakota
    • June 3, 1997
    ...N.D.C.C. chapter 29-32.1. State v. McDonell, 550 N.W.2d 62, 65 (N.D.1996); State v. Werre, 453 N.W.2d 826, 827 (N.D.1990); State v. Wilson, 450 N.W.2d 422 (N.D.1990); State v. Sayler, 443 N.W.2d 915, 917-18 (N.D.1989). A post-conviction relief proceeding allows the parties to fully develop ......
  • State v. Wilson
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Dakota
    • February 21, 1991
    ...ineffective assistance of counsel issue at a proceeding for post-conviction relief pursuant to Chapter 29-32.1, N.D.C.C." State v. Wilson, 450 N.W.2d 422 (N.D.1990). After remand, Wilson applied for post-conviction In his application, Wilson claimed that his trial counsel failed to offer im......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT