State v. Wilson

Decision Date10 December 1960
Docket NumberNo. 42065,42065
Citation357 P.2d 823,187 Kan. 486
PartiesSTATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Earl WILSON, Appellant.
CourtKansas Supreme Court

Kenneth Ray, Kansas City, argued the motion and was on the briefs for appellant.

Robert J. Foster, County Atty., argued the motion, and John Anderson, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Robert Hoffman, Asst. Atty. Gen., were with him on the briefs for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is a capital case in which the death sentence has been stayed by this court during defendant's appeal to the court. Appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. In a similar situation, this court speaking through Mr. Chief Justice Harvey, said in State v. Miller, 165 Kan. 228, at page 238, 194 P.2d 498, at page 506:

'Prior to that time appellant's counsel had filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. This motion was denied, for, as we interpret out statute (G.S.1935, 62-2414), when a case of this kind has been appealed and the execution of appellant has been stayed pending the appeal, the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed or reversed. If affirmed this court must appoint a day certain and order the execution of the sentence of the trial court. If the judgment of the trial court is reversed this court would order a new trial, or that the defendant be discharged.'

We think that G.S.1949, 62-2414, applies to all capital cases where the death sentence has been imposed and the trial court's judgment is still in force.

The motion to dismiss is denied upon the above authority.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Andrews v. Hand
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • June 9, 1962
    ...State v. Lammers, 171 Kan. 668, 672, 237 P.2d 410; Germany v. Hudspeth, 174 Kan. 1, 252 P.2d 858; State v. Andrews, supra; State v. Wilson, 187 Kan. 486, 357 P.2d 823; State v. Hickock & Smith, We now turn to the merits of the appeal. The petitioner was eighteen years of age and was a very ......
  • Martin v. Davis
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • December 10, 1960
    ... ... matters of order and procedure and to the continuing supervision and control of the practice of the law not in conflict with the federal and state constitutions ...         6. No final judgment results when the supreme court admits an applicant to the Bar of the state of Kansas; a ... 398; Farlin v. Sook, 30 Kan. 401, 1 P. 123; In re Smith, 73 Kan. 743, 85 P. 584; In re Wilson, 79 Kan. 450, 100 P. 75; In re Gorsuch, 113 Kan. 380, 214 P. 794; In re Hanson, 134 Kan. 165, 5 P.2d 1088; State, ex rel. v. Perkins, 138 Kan. 899, ... ...
  • State v. Hasty
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • January 22, 1966
    ...except in capital cases or where the punishment is life imprisonment. (State v. Miller, 165 Kan. 228, 194 P.2d 498; State v. Wilson, 187 Kan. 486, 357 P.2d 823; 24 C.J.S. Criminal Law § 1668, p. 1047.) Likewise, the right to appeal may be waived by pursuing an alternative remedy, although t......
  • State v. Mooneyham
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • March 7, 1964
    ...except in capital cases or where the punishment is life imprisonment. (State v. Miller, 165 Kan. 228, 194 P.2d 498; State v. Wilson, 187 Kan. 486, 357 P.2d 823; 24 C.J.S. Criminal Law § 1668, p. 1047.) Likewise, the right to appeal may be waived by pursuing an alternative remedy, although t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT