State v. Woodmansee

Decision Date13 December 1930
Docket NumberNo. 40376.,40376.
Citation212 Iowa 596,233 N.W. 725
PartiesSTATE v. WOODMANSEE.
CourtIowa Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from District Court, Polk County; Lester L. Thompson, Judge.

The defendant, Fred A. Woodmansee, was indicted January 15, 1930, by the grand jury of Polk county, Iowa, for the crime of murder. The defendant pleaded not guilty, and, on the issue thus joined, trial to a jury was had resulting in a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree, and the jury in its verdict recommended the death penalty. The trial court entered judgment on the verdict and imposed the death penalty. Defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

GRIMM and FAVILLE, JJ., dissenting.

Harry B. Grund, of Des Moines, for appellant.

John Fletcher, Atty. Gen., Neill Garrett, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Carl S. Missildine, Co. Atty., and Francis J. Kuble, Asst. Co. Atty., both of Des Moines, for the State.

DE GRAFF, J.

One W. F. Knapp, either a short time before or shortly after midnight on December 29, 1929, was most brutally assaulted in his living rooms on the third floor of a building located on the northeast corner of Fifth and Locust streets, Des Moines. He leased and occupied this building as owner of the Des Moines Trunk Factory. On the 10th day of January, 1930, Knapp died as a result of the assault. He was a man past 70 years of age, but was in good physical condition. He lived alone, and, so far as the record discloses, had no relatives. It is important at this point to visualize the third floor bedroom in which the assault took place, and the following diagram will be helpful in understanding the situation:

IMAGE

This room is approximately 11x18 feet. It had one window on the west side thereof which faced Fifth street. There was but one door of entrance and exit to and from this room, and that door opened into the hallway. There was in the room a small alcove used as a dressing room.

The Franklin Hotel is located directly across the street west from the building occupied by Knapp. The lobby and windows of the hotel face Fifth street and are directly opposite the entrance to the stairway of the building. There are large windows on either side of the entrance to the hotel, and the chairs inside of the lobby are so placed that persons occupying the chairs can look out upon Fifth street. Briefly stated, any one sitting in any of those chairs had a full view of the entrance to the trunk factory and to the third floor, which had the one window in the bedroom used by Mr. Knapp as his living and sleeping quarters.

It is evident from the record that on the night of the assault Mr. Knapp was about to retire. He had removed his clothing and was wearing his nightshirt and slippers. It is evident that he momentarily left the bedroom and had walked down the hall to the toilet room, and upon his return was surprised in the alcove by his assailant. The record discloses that about 12:30 on the night in question a bellboy, employed by the Franklin Hotel, had occasion to go on an errand to a nearby drug store and as he left the entrance of the hotel he heard cries for help which apparently came from the bedroom window on the third floor of the building across the street. The boy stopped and listened for a moment and immediately returned and reentered the hotel and told the incident to the hotel clerk, who immediately telephoned the city police department. The bellboy forthwith returned to the street and continued to listen and watch from his post outside the hotel. While he stood there, some one closed the one bedroom window, but even with the window closed the boy continued to hear cries for help. This boy was acquainted with Knapp, and he testified that he recognized the voice calling for help to be that of Knapp. The boy further testified that he could hear what appeared to be some one striking or hitting something. He stood guard watching the bedroom window and the entranceway until the police officers arrived and entered the premises. He testified that no one left the building prior to the arrival of the police, and that no one entered the building except the police officers.

The policeman on the beat (Officer Seehan) arrived on the scene at the same time as the two officers called by the hotel clerk. These three officers rushed up the stairs to the third floor and went to the only entrance door of the bedroom occupied by Knapp. These officers as they went up the second flight of stairs and approached the third floor heard some one scream: “My God, you are killing me, you are killing me.” They testified that this statement was repeated several times. Upon reaching the third floor, the officers rushed through the little hall to the bedroom entrance door, where again they heard this voice. Officer Brown was in the lead. He tried to open the only door of entrance, but it was locked. He then kicked in the door and the officers entered the bedroom. The electric drop light in the alcove was on, but the electric light in the bedroom was not on. The officers flashed their lights and the first thing they observed was Mr. Knapp on the floor in the alcove. Knapp was covered with blood and was sitting in a pool of blood. At once Officer Brown asked him, “Who did it, and where is he?” Knapp replied, “Look out, he is behind the door,” meaning the only entrance door to the room. Officer Brown wheeled, pulled the bedroom door toward him, and there found the defendant in hiding behind the door. The officer led the man directly in front of Mr. Knapp and asked Knapp is this was the man that beat him up, and Knapp said, “Yes it was.” The officer then asked Knapp if he knew the man, and Knapp replied that it was Dr. Woodmansee. Knapp then said to Woodmansee: “Oh Doc, why did you do this? Doc, why did you do this?” The officers testified that Knapp kept saying that over and over again. Woodmansee made no reply, but Brown asked Woodmansee what he was doing up there, to which Woodmansee replied that he heard cries from that room as he went along the street and went up to the room. It must be remembered that there was but one door of entrance to this bedroom, and, when the officers arrived, that door was locked. The keys which would lock and unlock the door were in Woodmansee's pocket, as hereinafter explained.

Immediately after the officers entered, a search of the room was made and an iron bar was found. This bar was wrapped in brown paper. It was about one inch in diameter and about fifteen inches long. It was found eight or ten feet west of Mr. Knapp in the center of the floor of the bedroom inside the fold of Mr. Knapp's coat, and in the pocket of the coat was Knapp's diamond ring and money. Blood covered the paper around this iron bar. The officers also found a work stool about two feet west of Knapp in the alcove and another work stool under the bed. These stools were broken and bloody and apparently had been used in the assault. Hair was found in the crusts of blood on the iron bar and on the stools. There were some clothes on the floor south of the bed, and there was blood on the woodwork of the opening between the alcove and the bedroom. There was blood on the front of the entrance bedroom door and on the door casing and on the bed. Mr. Knapp, at the time the officers entered, was bleeding freely. At that time, there was blood on the face, glasses, hands, and the clothing of Woodmansee. Knapp's head was cut in many places. His neck and chest were cut. His hands were covered with blood and were bleeding, and some of the fingers were so badly smashed that the finger bones protruded.

At the time the officers started to carry Knapp on a stretcher from the room, he told the officers to get the key in the bedroom door, which key opened the only door to the room and to get the key to his trunk factory. The keys were not in the door, but Woodmansee was searched, and all the keys were found in Woodmansee's right coat pocket. Woodmansee was then taken to the police station. He was not talkative. He showed no evidence of intoxication. Officer Shaffer testified that he smelled Woodmansee's breath and could detect no odor of intoxicating liquor, and that Woodmansee was perfectly sober and walked all right.

Officer Brown testified that in his conversation with Woodmansee he asked him how he could get into the room when the door was locked. Woodmansee made no reply. He also asked Woodmansee if there was anybody there when he went to the room, and Woodmansee replied that he passed somebody in the hall and asked the officer if he did not pass some one. Brown told Woodmansee that “nobody could get out of here but you, and you ain't out.”

It may be stated at this time that, for three or four nights preceding the fatal assault, Woodmansee had been observed by patrons and employees of the Franklin Hotel sitting in one of the chairs in the lobby facing Fifth street and the building occupied by Knapp. Woodmansee was not a guest or patron of the hotel. Some of the persons who had seen Woodmansee sitting near the window in the lobby had engaged in conversation with him.

After Woodmansee had been arrested, taken to jail, and placed in a cell, he burned holes in his clothing and at the spots where there were blood stains. His explanation was that he was smoking a cigarette and had his coat over his head and shoulders to keep the light out of his eyes and to keep warm; that he went to sleep with a cigarette in his mouth, and that his clothing took fire from the cigarette. There were spots of blood on his coat and on the legs of his trousers, but there were no holes in his suit at the time of his arrest. His shirt, while he was in jail, disappeared. Woodmansee, shortly after he was placed in jail, told Steve Howard, one of the city detectives, that he (Woodmansee) went upstairs and found Knapp on the floor about the time the police officers arrived. Woodmansee also stated that he fell down and got the blood on his clothes. The detective asked him if he wanted to make a statement about...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • People v. Modesto
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • June 4, 1963
    ... ... Since Connie had been carried downstream in rapidly moving water and had been in the water nine to ten hours, the pathologist was unable to state whether or not she had been sexually molested ...         It was not disputed at the trial that defendant killed the two girls. The ... '' (Accord, State v. Woodmansee (1930), Iowa) 212 Iowa 596, 233 N.W. 725, 735(15, 16).) ...         The defendant in State v. Clokey (1961, Idaho) 83 Idaho 322, 364 P.2d ... ...
  • Ver Steegh v. Flaugh
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • June 14, 1960
    ... ... Flaugh boar and three of the gilts that aborted and sent it in separate test tubes for analysis to the veterinary diagnostic laboratory at Iowa State University at Ames. The laboratory's report of the analysis was that the boar and one gilt reacted to brucellosis, commonly called Bang's disease, ... See in this connection Kuiken v. Garrett, 243 Iowa 785, 804, 51 N.W.2d 149, 160, 41 A.L.R.2d 1397, and citations; State v. Woodmansee, 212 Iowa 596, 613-614, 233 N.W. 725; State v. Van Tassel, 103 Iowa 6, 13, 72 N.W. 497. See also Lowman v. Kuecker, 246 Iowa 1227, 1230-1231, 71 ... ...
  • State v. Rutledge, 47601
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • April 4, 1951
    ... ... 401; State v. Luther, 150 Iowa 158, 129 N.W. 801; State v. Johnson, 221 Iowa 8, 264 N.W. 596, 267 N.W. 91; State v. Walker, 133 Iowa 489, 498, 110 N.W. 925; State v. Johnston, 221 Iowa 933, 267 N.W. 698; State v. Hessenius, 165 Iowa 415, 146 N.W. 58, L.R.A.1915A, 1078; State v. Woodmansee, 212 Iowa 596, 233 N.W. 725 ...         Moreover, although the instructions permitted the jury to find defendant guilty of manslaughter the jury found defendant guilty of a higher degree of homicide. Hence, the jury would doubtless not have convicted of any lower offense, had such ... ...
  • Glatstein v. Grund
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • January 8, 1952
    ... ... It is well settled that declarations of the alienated spouse during the period of alienation may be shown as bearing on the state of his mind and affections toward plaintiff and the effect of defendant's conduct upon him. Such evidence is not competent to show defendant in fact ... State v. Gibson, 189 Iowa 1212, 1225, [243 Iowa 550] 174 N.W. 34; State v. Plew, 207 Iowa 624, 627, 223 N.W. 362; State v. Woodmansee, 212 Iowa 596, 613 614, 233 N.W. 725; Jackson v. Chicago, M. St. P. & P. R. Co., 238 Iowa 1253, 1262, 1263, 30 N.W.2d 97, 102, and citations. See ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT