State v. Woodruff

Decision Date26 February 1980
Docket NumberNo. 42829,42829
CitationState v. Woodruff, 205 Neb. 638, 288 N.W.2d 754 (Neb. 1980)
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Randall WOODRUFF, Appellant.

Syllabus by the Court

1.Criminal Law: Controlled Substances: Evidence: Motor Vehicles.Constructive possession may be proved by direct or circumstantial evidence, and may be shown by the accused's proximity to the substance at the time of the arrest or by a showing of ownership, dominion, and right of control over an automobile in which the contraband was found.

2.Criminal Law: Evidence: Verdicts.It is not the province of this court to resolve conflicts in the evidence, pass upon the credibility of witnesses, determine the plausibility of explanations, or weigh the evidence.Such matters are for the trier of fact and the verdict must be sustained if, taking the view most favorable to the State, there is sufficient evidence to support it.

Jacobsen, Orr & Nelson, Kearney, for appellant.

Paul L. Douglas, Atty. Gen., and Lynne Rae Fritz, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lincoln, for appellee.

Heard before KRIVOSHA, C. J., BOSLAUGH, McCOWN, CLINTON, BRODKEY, WHITE, and HASTINGS, JJ.

McCOWN, Justice.

The defendant, after trial, was found guilty by the court of possession of a controlled substance, and sentenced to imprisonment for not less than 1 nor more than 3 years.

In the early morning hours of October 11, 1978, the defendant took possession of a brown Volkswagen station wagon which he had purchased from Gary Jensen.The defendant assisted Jensen in cleaning out the vehicle and removing Jensen's belongings.Jensen testified that, to the best of his knowledge, none of his possessions were left in the vehicle.Title to the vehicle was not delivered to defendant pending the payment of a small balance due on the purchase price.

On October 12, 1978, at around 4:40 p. m., two Kearney police officers went to a residence in Kearney, Nebraska, to arrest the defendant on a felony arrest warrant.The brown Volkswagen station wagon was parked in the driveway.The officers were informed by a woman at the residence that the defendant was not there.The officers drove around the corner and one of the officers kept the residence under observation.Shortly thereafter the woman and the defendant ran from the house and got into the station wagon.The woman got into the driver's seat.The defendant got into the back seat and lay down out of sight with his head toward the driver's side of the automobile.They drove away.The officers pursued and stopped the vehicle.Both the defendant and the woman were arrested.The officers briefly looked into the vehicle, but did not search it at the time.The vehicle was towed to the police garage by a tow truck and secured there.

Approximately an hour later an inventory search of the vehicle was made.A small black wooden box, approximately 2 X 2 X 5 inches was found partially under the driver's seat and partially on the floor behind the driver's seat.The box contained a powder which was subsequently determined to be methamphetamines.The defendant's jacket was lying across the rear of the back seat and a syringe needle was found in the pocket of the jacket.Several other items were also found during the inventory search.Under the front seat a black vinyl case was found which contained, among other items, an envelope addressed to the defendant containing a bail bond receipt.A note including a list of dates and amounts, signed by "Randy," was also found.The defendant testified that he had moved the envelope from his previous vehicle and placed it in the Volkswagen.He denied any knowledge about the black box, the syringe needle, or the note and list.

The District Court found the defendant guilty and sentenced him to imprisonment for not less than 1 nor more...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • State v. Draganescu
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • 22 Agosto 2008
    ...256 Neb. 133, 589 N.W.2d 108 (1999). 96. See, e.g., State v. Faircloth, 181 Neb. 333, 148 N.W.2d 187 (1967). 97. See State v. Woodruff, 205 Neb. 638, 288 N.W.2d 754 (1980). Compare, Flores, supra note 95; Nelson, supra note 94. 98. See, Paez v. O'Lone, 772 F.2d 1158 (3d Cir. 1985); U.S. v. ......
  • State v. Morris
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • 3 Marzo 1983
    ...United States v. Hubbard, 429 A.2d 1334 (D.C.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 857, 102 S.Ct. 308, 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981); State v. Woodruff, 205 Neb. 638, 288 N.W.2d 754 (1980); Peters v. State, 521 S.W.2d 233 (Tenn.Cr.App.1975); State v. Cleppe, 96 Wash.2d 373, 635 P.2d 435 (1981); State v. Bo......
  • State v. McAleese
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • 25 Marzo 2022
    ...statutory limits for a valid crime is erroneous only; it is not a void sentence subject to collateral attack"); State v. Woodruff , 205 Neb. 638, 641, 288 N.W.2d 754, 757 (1980) ("[a] sentence to imprisonment which exceeds the maximum statutory period is merely erroneous and not void"); Hic......
  • State v. DeGroat
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • 17 Diciembre 1993
    ...establish the defendant's constructive possession of it. State v. Lonnecker, 237 Neb. 207, 465 N.W.2d 737 (1991). In State v. Woodruff, 205 Neb. 638, 288 N.W.2d 754 (1980), we wrote more specifically that constructive possession of a controlled substance may be proved by direct or circumsta......
  • Get Started for Free