State v. Yager
Decision Date | 20 May 1913 |
Citation | 157 S.W. 557 |
Parties | STATE v. YAGER. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
provides that all actions and proceedings under the article shall be in the nature of civil actions and tried as such. Section 1927 provides that a change of venue may be awarded in any "civil suit" to any court of record for the causes stated. Held, that a change of venue could be granted in a proceeding to remove a sheriff from office; the term "civil action" being equivalent to "civil suit."
4. SHERIFFS AND CONSTABLES (§ 6) — REMOVAL — GROUNDS — NONPERFORMANCE OF DUTY.
The act of a sheriff in absenting himself from the performance of his duties is not excused by the fact that his duties were performed in his absence by his deputies as well as or better than he would have performed them; Const. art. 2, § 18, requiring officers to devote their time personally to their official duties.
5. TRIAL (§ 252) — INSTRUCTIONS — APPLICABILITY TO EVIDENCE.
A requested charge, in proceedings to remove a sheriff from office for absenting himself from the performance of his duties, that if no official duty was neglected during his absence the jury could not find against him because of it was properly refused where the evidence showed that the sheriff's absence was for the purpose of avoiding arrest for assault and battery.
6. SHERIFFS AND CONSTABLES (§ 6) — REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS — ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE.
In a proceeding by the state to remove a sheriff from office for neglect of his duties, an information filed by the prosecuting attorney against the sheriff, charging him with assault and battery, was not admissible in evidence; it not appearing that defendant was convicted thereunder.
7. SHERIFFS AND CONSTABLES (§ 6) — REMOVAL — NONPERFORMANCE OF DUTY — DEFENSES.
The fact that misconduct by a sheriff in failing to perform his official duties was due to his own weakness and moral delinquencies was not a defense, under the statute, to removal proceedings.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Pike County; B. H. Dyer, Judge.
Proceeding by the State of Missouri against Theodore H. Yager to remove defendant as sheriff. From a judgment of removal, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.
This is a proceeding brought by the prosecuting attorney of Pike county against the defendant, as sheriff of said county, to remove the defendant from office pursuant to the provisions of sections 10204 and 10205, R. S. Mo. 1909. Upon a trial had before a jury, defendant was found guilty as charged, and judgment of ouster from office was duly entered by the circuit court of Pike county. From this judgment defendant appeals.
This case was set down for trial at the July term, 1912, of the circuit court of Pike county, at which time defendant appeared and filed his answer admitting that he was the duly elected, commissioned, qualified, and acting sheriff of Pike county, and had been such since the 1st day of January, 1909; answering further he denied all other facts contained in the complaint. The case was not tried at the regular term, but for some reason, not material here, it was passed to an adjourned term of said circuit court, which adjourned term began some time in the month of September, 1912. The trial of defendant was had on the 9th day of September, 1912. On the 5th day of September, 1912, defendant filed his application for a change of venue in this cause, which application was duly verified, and, caption omitted, is as follows: This application for a change of venue was overruled by the court upon the theory that "this is not a civil proceeding, within the meaning of the change of venue law, and that defendant is not entitled to a change of venue under the act under which this proceeding is brought." To the action of the court in overruling his application for a change of venue, defendant duly saved his exceptions. No point being made as to extraneous matters not appearing in the application itself and in the reasons given for overruling the same, it is unnecessary to refer to them here further than to say that all other matters entitling defendant to a change of venue appear from the record; and, if he was not so entitled, the reasons therefor appear from applying the law to what is above set out.
The complaint on which defendant was prosecuted, after charging his election as sheriff and his qualification as such, which defendant duly admitted by answer, proceeded to charge official derelictions against him as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Coleman v. Kansas City
...Louis, 213 Mo. 384, 111 S.W. 1159; State ex rel. Langford v. Kansas City, 261 S.W. 115; Bradley v. Page, 46 S.W. (2d) 208; State v. Yager, 250 Mo. 388, 157 S.W. 557. (8) 110 of the assignors in the instant suit joined with others in a suit brought by the First National Bank of Kansas City, ......
-
State ex Inf. McKittrick v. Williams, 36718.
... ... Ed. 1200; Guillermo Alvarez Y Sanchez v. United States, 216 U.S. 167, 56 L. Ed. 435. (7) The evidence in the instant case shows overwhelmingly that respondent wilfully neglected to enforce the criminal laws in Jackson County. 57 C.J., sec. 37, p. 745; 40 C.J., sec. 16, p. 1221; State v. Yager, 157 S.W. 557, 250 Mo. 388; State v. Reichman, 135 Tenn. 653, 188 S.W. 232; State v. Martin, 87 Kan. 817, 126 Pac. 1080; Barbee v. McMurphy, 149 Va. 406, 141 S.W. 237; State v. Teeters, 112 Kan. 70, 209 Pac. 818; Reeves v. Texas, 258 S.W. 577; State v. Dyson, 106 Neb. 277, 183 N.W. 298; Freas v ... ...
-
State ex rel. Poston v. District Court
...95 N.E. 569; Knickerbocker Co. v. Tolman, 80 Ill. 106; Woodworth v. Bank, 144 Mich. 338; Herbert v. Beckhart, 26 Kans. 746; State v. Yager, (Mo.) 157 S.W. 557; Little Co., 214 P. 596; Baldwin v. Marygold, 2 Wis. 419. Cases cited by respondent are affected by peculiar statutory provisions in......
- State ex rel. Union Electric L. & P. Co. v. Bruce.