State v. York
| Decision Date | 03 March 2009 |
| Docket Number | No. 82455-0 |
| Citation | State v. York, 206 P.3d 674, 165 Wn.2d 1030 (Wash. 2009) |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Parties | State v. York |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Common Sense Alliance, P.J. Taggares Co. v. Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd.
...the takings clause. See, e.g., Citizens' All. for Prop. Rights v. Sims, 145 Wn. App. 649, 656, 187 P.3d 786 (2008), review denied, 165 Wn.2d 1030 (2009): Guggenheim v. City of Goleta, 638 F.3d 1111, 1116-17 (9th Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 2455 (2011). We will address the facial ch......
-
Stevens County v. E. Wash. Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd.
...as well as in dollars. Citizens' Alliance for Property Rights v. Sims, 145 Wn. App. 649, 662, 187 P.3d 786 (2008), review denied, 165 Wn.2d 1030 (2009) (quoting Isla Verde Int'l Holdings, Inc. v. City of Camas, 146 Wn.2d 740, 758, 49 P.3d 867 (2002)). RCW 82.02.020 applies to development co......
- Sloan v. Zornes
14 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...v. Nethercutt, 157 Wash. 172, 288 P. 265 (1930): 15–4 nn.26-29 Schmidt v. Coogan, 162 Wn.2d 488, 173 P.3d 273 (2007), review denied, 165 Wn.2d 1030 (2009): 15–11 n.88 Schroeter, In re, 80 Wn.2d 1, 489 P.2d 917 (1971): 16–52; 16–56 Schwimmer, In re, 153 Wn.2d 752, 108 P.3d 761 (2005): 12–14 ......
-
Table of Cases
...103 Wash. 364, 174 P. 438 (1918): 9.5(3)(a) Citizens' Alliance for Property Rights v. Sims, 145 Wn. App. 649, 187 P.3d 786,review denied, 165 Wn.2d 1030 (2008): 16.6(3)(b) City of Seattle v. Blume, 134 Wn.2d 243, 947 P.2d 223 (1997): 19.3(7), 19.3(10)(b) City of Seattle v. Nazarenus, 60 Wn.......
-
Table of Cases
...App. 756, 129 P.3d 300 (2006):2.5(2) Citizens Alliance for Prop. Rights v. Sims, 145 Wn. App. 649, 187 P.3d 786 (2008), review denied, 165 Wn.2d 1030 (2009):4.9, 5.2(3), 19.4(2)(c) Citizens Alliance to Protect Our Wetlands v. City of Auburn, 126 Wn.2d 356, 894 P.2d 1300 (1995):14.1(2), 14.1......
-
§15.1 Elements of a Legal Malpractice Claim
...disability."); accord Schmidt v. Coogan, 162 Wn.2d 488, 492, 173 P.3d 273 (2007), on remand, 145 Wn. App. 1030 (2008), review denied, 165 Wn.2d 1030 (2009) ("A plaintiff in a malpractice suit is required to prove that, but for the attorney's negligence, she probably would have prevailed on ......
Get Started for Free