State v. York, 82455-0

Decision Date03 March 2009
Docket NumberNo. 82455-0,82455-0
Citation206 P.3d 674,165 Wn.2d 1030
CourtWashington Supreme Court
PartiesState v. York

Appeal from 36381-0-II.

Disposition of petition for review. Denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Common Sense Alliance, P.J. Taggares Co. v. Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd., 72235-2-I
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • August 10, 2015
    ...the takings clause. See, e.g., Citizens' All. for Prop. Rights v. Sims, 145 Wn. App. 649, 656, 187 P.3d 786 (2008), review denied, 165 Wn.2d 1030 (2009): Guggenheim v. City of Goleta, 638 F.3d 1111, 1116-17 (9th Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 2455 (2011). We will address the facial ch......
  • Stevens County v. E. Wash. Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd.
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • June 28, 2011
    ...as well as in dollars. Citizens' Alliance for Property Rights v. Sims, 145 Wn. App. 649, 662, 187 P.3d 786 (2008), review denied, 165 Wn.2d 1030 (2009) (quoting Isla Verde Int'l Holdings, Inc. v. City of Camas, 146 Wn.2d 740, 758, 49 P.3d 867 (2002)). RCW 82.02.020 applies to development co......
  • Sloan v. Zornes, 82528-9
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • March 3, 2009
14 books & journal articles
  • §15.1 Elements of a Legal Malpractice Claim
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association The Law of Lawyering in Washington (WSBA) Chapter 15 Legal Malpractice and Other Theories of Lawyer Liability
    • Invalid date
    ...disability."); accord Schmidt v. Coogan, 162 Wn.2d 488, 492, 173 P.3d 273 (2007), on remand, 145 Wn. App. 1030 (2008), review denied, 165 Wn.2d 1030 (2009) ("A plaintiff in a malpractice suit is required to prove that, but for the attorney's negligence, she probably would have prevailed on ......
  • § 7.4 - Limitations
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Real Property Deskbook Series Volume 6: Land Use Development (WSBA) Chapter 7 Development Exactions and Impact Fees
    • Invalid date
    ...of conditions...." See Citizens' Alliance for Prop. Rights (CAPR) v. Sims, 145 Wn. App. 649, 664, 187 P.3d 786 (2008), review denied, 165 Wn.2d 1030 (2009). Thus, any analysis of the propriety of an exaction or impact fee should begin with the basis for the local jurisdiction's authority to......
  • Chapter A. Changes in Property Or Entitlement
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Law of Wills and Intestate Succession (WSBA) Chapter 5
    • Invalid date
    ...Wn.2d 432. 17 Wash. Escrow Co., 40 Wn.2d at 436. 18 In re Estate of Frank, 146 Wn. App. 309, 324-25, 189 P.3d 834 (2008), review denied, 165 Wn.2d 1030 (2009). Therefore, even if the preexecution conveyance is for some reason declared invalid, the gift in the will would still stand. 19 Atki......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Law of Wills and Intestate Succession (WSBA) Table Of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...310 Francon v. Cox, 38 Wn.2d 530, 231 P.2d 265 (1951): 376 Frank, In re Estate of, 146 Wn. App. 309, 189 P.3d 834 (2008), review denied, 165 Wn.2d 1030 (2009): 173 Frederick v. Michaelson, 138 Wash. 55, 244 P. 119 (1926): 289 Friedlander v. Friedlander, 80 Wn.2d 293, 494 P.2d 208 (1972): 24......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT