State v. Young
| Court | Supreme Court of Connecticut |
| Citation | 264 Conn. 912,826 A.2d 1157 |
| Decision Date | 17 June 2003 |
| Parties | STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. WILLIE YOUNG |
264 Conn. 912
826 A.2d 1157
v.
WILLIE YOUNG
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Decided June 17, 2003.
Mary Anne Royle, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 76 Conn. App. 392 (AC 22860), is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
38 cases
-
State v. Thomas, AC 38193
...before the jury, namely, the guilt or innocence of the defendant." State v. Young, 76 Conn.App. 392, 404, 819 A.2d 884, cert. denied, 264 Conn. 912, 826 A.2d 1157 (2003) ; see also State v. Swain, 101 Conn.App. 253, 275, 921 A.2d 712, cert. denied, 283 Conn. 909, 928 A.2d 539 (2007). The re......
-
State v. Mucha, No. 32395.
...impropriety lessened when trial court instructed jury that statements and arguments of counsel were not evidence), cert. denied, 264 Conn. 912, 826 A.2d 1157 (2003). Finally, we consider the sixth Williams factor, namely, the strength of the state's case. State v. Williams, supra, 204 Conn.......
-
State v. Carrillo, AC 43529
...conclude that the prosecutor's comments are analogous to those used in State v. Young , 76 Conn. App. 392, 819 A.2d 884, cert. denied, 264 Conn. 912, 826 A.2d 1157 (2003). In Young , the prosecutor argued to the jurors that they should not to be " ‘fooled’ " by defense counsel's arguments a......
-
State v. Burgos, AC 38394
...sign the transcript, or "make any findings whatsoever regarding the suggestiveness of the arraignment proceedings"), cert. denied, 264 Conn. 912, 826 A.2d 1157 (2003).IVThe defendant's final claim on appeal is that the trial court improperly denied his motion to vacate on the ground that hi......
Request a trial to view additional results