State v. Zorn

Decision Date30 April 1880
Citation71 Mo. 415
PartiesTHE STATE v. ZORN, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Gasconade Circuit Court.--HON. A. J. SEAY, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

E. M. Clark for appellant.

J. L. Smith, Attorney-General, for the State.

NORTON, J.

Defendant was indicted in the circuit court of Gasconade county, for an assault with intent to rob. He was put upon his trial on his plea of not guilty, which resulted in a verdict of guilty. From the judgment entered thereon defendant has appealed to this court, and seeks a reversal thereof, first, because the verdict is not warranted by the evidence; second, because the court erred in giving the third instruction on behalf of the State.

1. CRIMINAL LAW: defendant as a witness.

The instruction complained of is as follows: “The defendant is competent to testify as a witness in this case, but the fact that he is the defendant may be shown for the purpose of affecting his credibility.” An instruction similar to this, and containing the same principle, was expressly approved by this court in the case of the State v. Maguire, 69 Mo. 197.

2. _____: rule of this court as to setting aside verdict as against evidence.

As to the objection made that the verdict is not warranted by the evidence, it may be observed that in the case of the State v. Cook, 58 Mo. 546, it was held that even in a criminal case, before the court will relieve on the ground that the verdict is not warranted by the evidence, there must be either a total absence of evidence or it must so completely fail to support the verdict, that the necessary inference is, that the jury must have acted from prejudice or partiality. Applying this rule to the evidence in this case, we see no ground for interference. The person assaulted was the only witness to the assault, and he testified that he went with defendant into a saloon, where they drank beer together, and upon witness saying that he was going to Nilhoff's hotel defendant volunteered to go with him, and that defendant, instead of going the direct route to the hotel, induced witness to go out of the way, and when he remonstrated with defendant and refused to go any further in that direction, defendant struck him in the back of the head with a rock which he held in his hand, felling him to the ground; that when he recovered, defendant said, “Give me your money,” and upon being told by witness he had but five cents left, defendant cursed witness and left him. The only contradiction to these statements is in the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
37 cases
  • The State v. Finkelstein
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 29 Enero 1917
    ... ... the testimony of defendant and his or her spouse, while ... sometimes criticized as useless, is not reversible error ... [Kelley's Crim. Law & Prac., p. 344; State v ... Maguire, 69 Mo. 197 (decided in 1878); State v ... Zorn, 71 Mo. 415; State v. Cooper, 71 Mo. 436; ... State v. McGinnis, 76 Mo. 326; State v ... Sanders, 76 Mo. 35; State v. Wisdom, 84 Mo ... 177; State v. Cook, 84 Mo. 40; State v ... Miller, 93 Mo. 263, 6 S.W. 57; State v. Brooks, ... 99 Mo. 137, 12 S.W. 633; State v. Brown, ... ...
  • State v. Evans
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 1 Marzo 1916
    ...State v. Fox, 148 Mo. 517, 50 S.W. 98; State v. Napper, 141 Mo. l. c. 401, 42 S.W. 957; State v. Lingle, 128 Mo. 528, 31 S.W. 20; State v. Zorn, 71 Mo. 415; State McGinnis, 76 Mo. 326; State v. Cook, 84 Mo. 40; State v. Wisdom, 84 Mo. l. c. 177 at 190; State v. Ihrig, 106 Mo. l. c. 267, 17 ......
  • McClanahan v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 8 Marzo 1910
    ... ... Railroad, 37 Mo.App. 454; Kerstner ... v. Vorweg, 130 Mo. 196; Bank v. Worthington, ... 145 Mo. 103; Standard Oil Co. v. State (Tenn.), 10 ... L.R.A. (N. S.) 1015. And in a case like this the rule ... requires the plaintiff to call the physician who examined her ... 307; Cook v ... Railroad, 94 Mo.App. 417; Cannon v. Moore, 17 ... Mo.App. 92; State v. Musick, 71 Mo. 401; State ... v. Zorn, 71 Mo. 415; State v. Jaeger, 66 Mo ... 173; Rosecranz v. Railroad, 83 Mo. 678; Baker v ... Stonebraker, 36 Mo. 338; Price & Sherrill v ... ...
  • State v. Evans
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 1 Marzo 1916
    ...782; State v. Fox, 148 Mo. 517, 50 S. W. 98; State v. Napper, 141 Mo. 407, 42 S. W. 957; State v. Lingle, 128 Mo. 528, 31 S. W. 20; State v. Zorn, 71 Mo. 415; State v. McGinnis, 76 Mo. 326; State v. Cook, 84 Mo. 40; State v. Wisdom, 84 Mo. loc. cit. 190; State v. Ihrig, 106 Mo. loc. cit. 27......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT