State v. Zornes

Decision Date14 May 1970
Docket Number40223,Nos. 40222
CitationState v. Zornes, 469 P.2d 552, 78 Wash.2d 9 (Wash. 1970)
CourtWashington Supreme Court
Partiesw The STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Robert A. ZORNES and Jenice Zornes, Appellants.
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
92 cases
  • State v. Ross
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • August 12, 2004
    ...need only be expressed in `words that fairly convey that intention.'" Kane, 101 Wash.App. at 612,5 P.3d 741 (quoting State v. Zornes, 78 Wash.2d 9, 13, 475 P.2d 109 (1970)).9 In both Zornes and Grant, we held that the legislature included language which conveyed its intent that amendments t......
  • State v. Peterson
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • November 18, 2021
    ...State Constitution can, and often does, raise the ceiling to offer greater or equal protections. Id . This court concluded in Olsen and Zornes that article I, section 12 and the Fourteenth Amendment are violated when one or more operative statutes prescribing different punishments for the s......
  • State v. Campbell
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • November 6, 1984
    ...denied when a prosecutor is permitted to seek varying degrees of punishment when proving identical criminal elements. State v. Zornes, 78 Wash.2d 9, 21, 475 P.2d 109 (1970). However, "no constitutional defect exists when the crimes which the prosecutor has discretion to charge have differen......
  • City of Seattle v. Buchanan
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • September 28, 1978
    ...the activities in question been correctly defined. We have, by dictum, taken note of the principle involved, in State v. Zornes, 78 Wash.2d 9, 20, 475 P.2d 109, 116 (1970), where we said: It is doubtful whether a legislative declaration contrary to all the evidence can be sustained as const......
  • Get Started for Free