Staton v. State
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | HILL, J. |
| Citation | Staton v. State, 174 Ga. 719, 163 S.E. 901 (Ga. 1932) |
| Decision Date | 14 April 1932 |
| Docket Number | 8801. |
| Parties | STATON v. STATE. |
Syllabusby the Court.
Evidence held sufficient to sustain murder conviction as against alibi defense.
Motions for new trial based on newly discovered evidence are addressed largely to trial judge's discretion.
Supreme Court will not reverse trial judge's decision refusing new trial for newly discovered evidence unless discretion is abused.
Refusing new murder trial for newly discovered evidence of alleged eyewitness to shooting that another than accused fired shot contradicted by counter affidavits, held not manifest abuse of trial judge's discretion.
In murder prosecution, where question of personal identity of accused and fact of alibi were virtually same defense court's omission to instruct separately on alibi held not error.
Where testimony for accused did not show impossibility of his presence at scene of homicide, failure to give specific charge, not requested, regarding alibi defense, held not error.
1. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the jury to find a verdict of guilty.
2. Motions for new trial based on newly discovered evidence are addressed largely to the discretion of the trial judge; and this court will not reverse his decision refusing a new trial on such ground, unless it is abused. The judge did not abuse his discretion in the instant case in refusing a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.
3. Where the question of personal identity and the fact of alibi are virtually the same defense, the omission of the court to instruct separately on alibi is not error. The court did not err in failing to instruct the jury separately on the question of alibi, under the facts of the instant case.
4. The court did not err in refusing a new trial.
Error from Superior Court, Fulton County; John D. Humphries, Judge.
James F. Staton was convicted for murder, his motion for a new trial was overruled, and he brings error.
Affirmed.
Wm. G McRae, Parham & Simpson, Jas. C. Davis, and Walter E. Harclerode, all of Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.
John A. Boykin, Sol. Gen., J. W. Le Craw, and John H. Hudson, all of Atlanta, Geo. M. Napier, Atty. Gen., and T. R. Gress, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
James F. Staton was indicted and tried for the murder of Thomas J. Martin. He was found guilty, with a recommendation to mercy, and was sentenced to life imprisonment in the penitentiary. He filed a motion for new trial, which was amended by the addition of two special grounds. The motion was overruled, and he excepted. The special grounds of the motion for new trial are (1) because of certain newly discovered evidence; and (2) because of the failure of the judge to charge the law with reference to the defense of alibi.
1. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict. It tended to show that Staton was a United States soldier stationed at Ft. McPherson in Fulton county, and that on May 20, 1931, between 11:00 and 12:00 o'clock p. m., he shot and killed another soldier named Thomas J. Martin, at or near the corner of Lee and Mickleberry streets, near Ft. McPherson. The evidence showed that Martin was walking along the street with a young woman named Georgia Phillips, with whom he had attended a dance at the service club at Ft. McPherson. Miss Phillips testified that she and Martin "watched them dance" for awhile, and then together walked down Lee street; that Staton, walked by them in company with a companion two or three times, and then came up to where they were and pointed a pistol at Private Martin. Martin replied, "You are not going to shoot me, are you?"
R. W. Johnson, for the state, testified:
F. F. Lightfoot, for the state, testified:
Private E. H. Chastain, for the state, testified: ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting