Stearns Lighting & Power Co. v. Central Trust Co.
Citation | 223 F. 962 |
Decision Date | 08 June 1915 |
Docket Number | 2618. |
Parties | STEARNS LIGHTING & POWER CO. et al. v. CENTRAL TRUST CO. et al. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) |
On Petition for Rehearing, June 30, 1915.
The appellants were two of the defendants below; the appellees were complainants. We adopt the statement of facts made by the District Judge, as follows:
'Except as hereinafter noted, the material and essential facts of this case have been stipulated and those which are necessary to the determination of the legal questions involved may be stated as follows: Each of the defendants Interurban Electric Light & Power Company (hereinafter called the Interurban Company) and Stearns Lighting & Power Company (hereinafter called the Stearns Company) was incorporated under the laws of the state of Michigan to carry on the business of conveying electricity for supplying electric light and power. On the 1st day of June, 1909, the Interurban Company, for the purpose, among other things, of raising money to carry on, extend, improve, and develop its business, and for the purchase of the property involved in this controversy, authorized the issue of 'first mortgage 6 per cent. gold bonds' aggregating $25,000 and bearing interest at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum, payable semiannually. On the same day, and in order to secure the payment of the bonds, the Interurban Company executed and delivered to complainants, as trustees, a mortgage or deed of trust covering all property of every kind and nature which it then owned, including its real estate, leasehold interests, power plants, buildings, machinery, right of way, easements, franchises, contracts for supplying electricity, revenues, accounts, demands, etc., and also 'all of the property, real, personal, and mixed, of all kinds whatsoever, * * * which the company may hereafter acquire, or to which it may hereafter become entitled, and which may be appurtenant to the business now or hereafter conducted by the said company.' On June 2, 1909, this mortgage was filed for record and recorded in the office of the register of deeds of Mason county, and on January 20, 1910, in the office of the register of deeds of Oceana county. No other or separate copy of the mortgage was filed in either of these offices and no affidavit showing the good faith of the parties and the adequacy of the consideration was attached to the mortgage so filed for record.
mortgage, and also subject to the lien of receiver's certificates which had been issued to the amount of $5,500. On January 3, 1911, the receiver executed a deed to Mayhon. In this deed the property was described as in complainants' mortgage, and was conveyed subject to the lien of complainants' mortgage and the receiver's certificates.
'On May 12, 1911, W. F. Mayhon entered into a contract to sell and convey to the defendant Stearns Company the property in controversy in this suit. The description of the property to be so sold and conveyed, the consideration to be paid therefor, and the covenants of the parties were set forth in the contract as follows:
'On June 27, 1911, to secure the issue of $100,000 of 'first mortgage 6 per cent. refunding gold bonds,' the Stearns Company executed and delivered to the First National Bank of Ludington, Mich., as trustee, a deed of trust covering all of its property, including 'the transmission line of the Interurban Electric Lighting & Power Company, extending from Hamlin Dam, in Mason county, Mich., to Pentwater, and thence toward Hart, Oceana county, Mich.' A corrected draft or redraft of this deed of trust was executed by the Stearns Company to the First National Bank of Ludington, Mich., dated July 1, 1911, and was filed in the office of the city clerk of Ludington on August 29, 1911, and was recorded in the office of the register of deeds of Mason county on October 18, 1911. Thereafter the First National Bank of Ludington resigned as trustee, and upon the nomination of certain holders of the bonds secured by the trust deed the defendant William L. Hammond was appointed successor trustee.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ellison v. Evergreen Cemetery
...leases for a term not exceeding three years, and executory contracts for the sale or purchase of lands. Stearns Lighting & Power Co. v. Central Trust Co., C.C.A.Mich. 223 F. 962, 966; Shralberg v. Hanson, 138 Minn. 80, 163 N.W. 1032, 1033. [Emphasis Thus, by 1964 the question of whether cem......
-
State ex rel. Sedalia Water Co. v. Harnsberger
...laid in land belonging to another, constitute realty, it is held that the mains are appurtenances of the land itself. Stearns Light & Power Co. v. Trust Co., 223 F. 962; California Water Co. v. Los Angeles Co. (Cal.), P. 547; Colorado Fuel Co. v. Water Co., 53 P. 232; Capital City Gas Co. v......
-
Potter v. Vernon
...3, 79 P. 527; Adams v. Hopkins, 144 Cal. 19, 77 P. 712; Seal of Gold Min. Co. v. Slater, 161 Cal. 621, 120 P. 15; Stearns Light, etc. Co. v. Central Trust Co., 223 F. 962; O'Brien v. Fleckenstein, 180 N.Y. 350, 73 N.E. 30. ¶10 In the case of U.S. Hooe, 3 Cranch (U.S.) 73, 2 L. Ed. 370, Chie......
-
John A. Roebling's Sons Company v. Nebraska Electric Company
... ... ELECTRIC COMPANY ET AL.: CHICAGO SAVINGS BANK & TRUST COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS No. 21362Supreme Court of ... electric light and power plants situated, respectively, in ... the towns of ... real estate of each one of the electric lighting plants and, ... by general terms, all buildings and ... 182, 187, ... 15 L. R. A. 652, 29 P. 476; Stearns L. & P. Co. v ... Central Trust Co., 223 F. 962; Steger ... ...