Stearns v. Newport Hospital
Decision Date | 29 June 1905 |
Citation | 27 R.I. 309,62 A. 132 |
Parties | STEARNS, Atty. Gen., et al. v. NEWPORT HOSPITAL. |
Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
Bill in equity by Charles F. Stearns, Attorney General, and others against the Newport Hospital. Heard on demurrer and answer. Case to stand for hearing.
Argued before DOUGLAS, C. J., and DUBOIS and BLODGETT, JJ.
J. Stacy Brown, for complainants. Darius Baker and Rathbone Gardner, for respondent.
The defendant is a corporation established in the city of Newport, under an act of the General Assembly passed February 12, 1873 (Laws 1873, p. 222), of which the first two sections are as follows:
An act was passed March 10, 1803 (Acts 1893, p. 554), section 2 of this act so that it should read as follows:
In November, 1882, after the organization of the defendant corporation under its charter, but before the passage of the foregoing amendment, the will of John Alfred Hazard was admitted to probate in Newport, and by the terms of said will the residue of his estate was devised and bequeathed to the Newport Hospital, its successors and assigns, forever, in trust, as follows:
This bill is brought against the Newport Hospital by the Attorney General, representing the public as beneficiary under the charitable trust created by the will of John Alfred Hazard, and by Patrick J. Boyle in his capacity as mayor of the city of Newport, acting under the direction of a resolution of the city council of said city, which instructs him, in his name as a trustee ex officio of the Newport Hospital, or in the name of the city, to institute proceedings, and also as a taxpayer of the city of Newport for himself and such other taxpayers as may join therein. The bill recites the charter of the defendant and the trust provisions of the will aforesaid, and alleges that at the time of the probate of the will the Newport Hospital could not legally take such a devise and bequest; that the hospital illegally took possession of the property, becoming a trustee in its own wrong, and has ever since remained in the wrongful possession thereof; that, while thus in wrongful possession, the respondent has violated the terms of the trust in that it has expended a portion of the principal of the trust estate; that it has further violated its trust by borrowing money upon the security of the principal of the trust estate, quoting as the foundation of this charge the last account of the treasurer of the hospital, and a statement in a recent report of the trustees to the effect that they had anticipated the further sale of land belonging to the corpus of the trust estate by incurring a debt; that by this use of the principal of the estate it has so diminished the income thereof that it has closed a ward which it formerly conducted for the treatment of contagious diseases, and has refused to open said ward, although requested so to do by the board of health of the city of Newport, alleging a lack of funds available for this purpose; that the city council, relying on the provisions of the Hazard trust to secure treatment of indigent persons suffering from contagious diseases, have made no other provision therefor, and that there is therefore no means of caring for such persons; that the continued expenditure of the principal of the trust estate, and the assumption of obligations in anticipation of the sale of land which is a part of the corpus of the trust estate, will ultimately result in its extinction; that the hospital has received from taxpayers of the city of Newport moneys amounting to upwards of $100,000 for the endowment of free beds for the use of poor persons suffering both from contagious and noncontagious diseases; and that these funds have been so negligently invested that there are now no free beds for contagious cases. The relief asked for is an accounting of the dealings of the respondent with the trust estate, an injunction against the expenditure of any more of the principal of the trust estate, a schedule of the balance and securities held by it for the benefit of the trust, and a list of all notes, mortgages, and other obligations incurred by the respondent and chargeable to the trust estate, and, finally, the appointment of new and competent trustees under the will of John Alfred Hazard. The respondent has filed a demurrer to the bill, on the ground that Patrick J. Boyle, in his several capacities, is not a proper party to this suit, and has also answered, denying certain allegations of fact and claiming certain defences in law.
The questions of law raised are: (1) Is Patrick J. Boyle, in his capacity as mayor of the city of Newport and ex officio trustee of the Newport Hospital, or...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
President and Fellows of Middlebury Coll. v. Cent. Power Corp. of Vt.
...purposes of its institution, but collateral to them. Vidal v. Mayor, etc., of Philadelphia, supra; Stearns v. Newport Hospital, 27 R. I. 309, 62 A. 132, 135, 8 Ann. Cas. 1176. We fail to perceive, in the trust as established by the will of Mr. Battell, any repugnancy or inconsistency with t......
-
Dickey v. Volker
...13; Association v. Beekman, 21 Barb. (N.Y.) 565; Green v. Blackwell, 35 Atl. 375; McKenzie v. Trustees, 67 N.J. Eq. 652; Stearns v. Newport Hospital, 27 R.I. 309; Ewell v. Sneed, 136 Tenn. 602; Gibson v. Frye Institute, 137 Tenn. 454; 2 Perry, Trusts (6 Ed.) sec. 732; 2 R.C.L. sec. 12, p. 9......
-
Dickey v. Volker
...such a case that officer, as representative of the public, would occupy the relation of cestui que trust to trustees." In Stearns v. Newport Hospital, 27 R. I. 309, l. c. 316, 62 A. 132, in ruling on the right of one of the plaintiffs to maintain the suit, it was said: "As a citizen and tax......
-
President And Fellows of Middlebury College v. Central Power Corporation of Vermont
... ... them. Vidal v. Mayor, etc., of Philadephia, ... supra ; Stearns v. Newport ... Hospital , 27 R.I. 309, 62 A. 132, 135, 8 Ann. Cas. 1176 ... We fail to ... ...