Stearns v. State, 5 Div. 663
Decision Date | 27 June 1957 |
Docket Number | 5 Div. 663 |
Parties | Lucius STEARNS v. STATE of Alabama. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Geo. P. Howard, Wetumpka, for appellant.
John Patterson, Atty. Gen., and Edmon L. Rinehart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. MERRILL, Justice.
Appellant was convicted of murder in the second degree and sentenced to twenty-five years in the penitentiary. His motion for a new trial was overruled and he appealed.
The defendant shot and killed the deceased sometime after 1:30 A.M. on October 2, 1955. There was evidence that deceased was about drunk and that defendant had been drinking. Both were Negroes.
Because the judgment of conviction must be reversed, we discuss only two of the four instances in which it is argued that reversible error occurred. The other two should not arise on another trial.
The defendant had taken the stand and his testimony, if believed, tended to make out a case of self-defense. He had testified that he knew that deceased had a reputation for being a violent, dangerous, bloodthirsty person. In rebuttal, the State was allowed to show by the sheriff, over objections, that defendant's reputation for being violent and bloodthirsty was bad. Defendant reserved an exception. This ruling of the trial court was reversible error.
In Dolan v. State, 81 Ala. 11, 1 So. 707, 713, Chief Justice Stone, speaking for the court, said:
* * *
'* * * A character for violence or turbulence sheds no light on the credibility of a witness; and such testimony was not admissible unless the defendant has first put his character for peace in issue. * * *'
The Dolan case had been cited many times for this proposition. We also quote from Brown v. State, 20 Ala.App. 39, 100 So. 616, 617:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wilcutt v. State
...or reputation cannot be based on the personal knowledge of the witness. Posey v. State, 38 Ala.App. 585, 90 So.2d 94; Stearns v. State, 266 Ala. 295, 96 So.2d 306. During the cross-examination of the defendant numerous questions and answers were read to him from a written statement made by ......
-
Pugh v. State
...a dirty fighter; 8 have all been rejected as subjects of enquiry. See also Thomas v. State, 41 Ala.App. 19, 122 So.2d 731; Stearns v. State, 266 Ala. 295, 96 So.2d 306; Bedsole v. State, 274 Ala. 603, 150 So.2d Aside from accomplices and convicted perjurers, no one group, whether saints or ......
-
Commonwealth v. Morales
...was prohibited even though evidence had been introduced concerning the victim's violent reputation or character. See Stearns v. State, 266 Ala. 295, 296–297, 96 So.2d 306 (1957); Keith v. State, 612 P.2d 977, 984–986 (Alaska 1980); Johns v. United States, 434 A.2d 463, 469–471 (D.C.1981); R......
-
Ellwest Stereo Theatres, Inc. v. State ex rel. Parsons
...Rev. 1970). "General character or reputation cannot be based on the individual or personal knowledge of the witness." Stearns v. State, 266 Ala. 295, 96 So.2d 306 (1957). This latter aspect of the rule of general reputation evidence was violated repeatedly in the testimony of plaintiffs' wi......