Stedman v. Bank of Monroe
Decision Date | 28 July 1902 |
Docket Number | 1,708. |
Parties | STEDMAN v. BANK OF MONROE. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
George Wambach, for appellant.
Carroll Wright, James P. Hewitt, and Craig T. Wright, for appellee.
Bankruptcy proceedings against William T. Sinnard, a retail clothing merchant of Monroe, Jasper county, Iowa, were instituted by the filing of creditors' petition June 4, 1900. On June 29, 1900, after adjudication, the matter was referred to S S. Ethridge, referee in bankruptcy, at Des Moines. On July 21, 1900, the Bank of Monroe filed with said referee its proof of secured debt, under oath, stating: Other creditors of said bankrupt, on 'July 23, 1900, filed with said referee objections to the allowance of this claim of the Bank of Monroe as a secured claim, alleging that at the time of the giving of said chattel mortgage Sinnard was indebted to said bank on another note for the sum of $1,500, for which the bank held as collateral a note belonging to said Sinnard, which was secured by a real estate mortgage, which note and mortgage were converted by said bank into money, and the 1,500 note thus extinguished; that at said times, and prior thereto, said sinnard was insolvent; and that the bank had reasonable cause to believe that said chattel mortgage was intended to give said bank a preference over any other creditor. Said bank thereafter, on September 28, 1900, filed anew the proof of its secured claim, withdrawing its waiver of security as to the $500 note. After hearing the testimony adduced, the referee, March 23, 1901, made his findings and decision as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Schindler
...not deprive the transfer of its preferential character to the extent of the security applicable to pre-existing debts. Stedman v. Bank of Monroe, 117 F. 237 (C.C.A. 8th); Brush v. Seymore, D.C., 30 F.Supp. 202, 204; Lowenstein v. Salop, 55 F.2d 889 (C.C.A.2d); City National Bank of Greenvil......
-
In re Jackson Brick & Tile Co.
... ... July 18, 1911 ... [189 F. 637] ... Oliver ... & Oliver, for Sturdivant Bank ... Fordyce-Holliday ... & White, for Merchants-Laclede Nat. Bank ... Moses ... 524; City Bank v. Bruce, 6 ... Am.Bankr.Rep. 311, 109 F. 69, 48 C.C.A. 236; Stedman ... v. Bank, 9 Am.Bankr.Rep. 4, 117 F. 237, 54 C.C.A. 269; ... Farmers' Bank v. Carr, 11 ... ...
-
Cauthorn v. Burley State Bank
...and to the extent of the pre-existing debt secured thereby." ( City National Bank v. Bruce, 109 F. 69, 48 C. C. A. 236; Stedman v. Bank of Monroe, 117 F. 237, 54 C. A. 269; In re Hull, 115 F. 858; In re Wolf, 98 F. 84; In re T. Furse & Co., 127 F. 690, 62 C. C. A. 446.) "Possession of a sto......
-
Morgan v. First Nat. Bank
... ... 191, 22 Sup.Ct. 74, 46 L.Ed. 147; In re ... Richards, 96 F. 935, 37 C.C.A. 634; City National ... Bank v. Bruce, 109 F. 69, 48 C.C.A. 236; Stedman v ... Bank of Monroe, 117 F. 237, tr C.C.A. 269; Pollack ... v. Jones, 124 F. 163, 167, 61 C.C.A. 555; Collier on ... Bankruptcy (5th Ed.) 454, ... ...