Stefanoni v. Duncan
Decision Date | 01 November 2005 |
Docket Number | (AC 25844) |
Citation | 92 Conn. App. 172,883 A.2d 1271 |
Court | Connecticut Court of Appeals |
Parties | CHRISTOPHER STEFANONI ET AL. v. IAN M. DUNCAN. |
McLachlan, Gruendel and Harper, Js.
Margaret Stefanoni, pro se, and Christopber Stefanoni, pro se, the appellants (plaintiffs).
Donald Bruce Hill, for the appellee (defendant).
The plaintiffs, Christopher Stefanoni and Margaret Stefanoni, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, concerning the existence of a prescriptive utility easement over a portion of their property and the extent of both a view restriction on and an access easement over the property of the defendant, Ian M. Duncan. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly held that (1) the defendant possesses a prescriptive utility easement over a portion of their property, (2) their easement over the defendant's property "for access to the waters of Holly Pond" does not include the rights to install a walkway and a dock, and to use for recreational purposes a widened portion of their easement, and (3) the language "the southwest bedroom" in the deeded view restriction1 means their second floor master bedroom rather than their ground floor southwest bedroom. We disagree with the plaintiffs' first claim, but agree with their second and third claims. Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts, as found by the court, are relevant to our resolution of the plaintiffs' appeal. "Holly Pond is a body of salt water forming a part of Long Island Sound located between the city of Stamford and the town of Darien. In the early part of the twentieth century, a dam was erected across the outlet where the pond empties into the sound. The dam prevents the waters of the pond from completely draining into Long Island Sound at low tide. However, the dam does not inhibit the waters of Long Island Sound from entering the pond as the tide rises. Accordingly, the level of Holly Pond is still subject to tidal variations. At low tide, the level of the water in the pond is two feet above the National Geodetic Vertical datum of 1929 (the standard reference elevation for the area). At mean high tide, the level of the water is 4.2 feet above the same datum. Although the pond is shallow, it is used for boating, to some extent.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stefanoni v. Duncan
...encumbering the defendant's property is to be measured from the bottom floor of the plaintiffs' residence. Stefanoni v. Duncan, 92 Conn. App. 172, 198-99, 203, 883 A.2d 1271 (2005). We reverse the judgment of the Appellate The Appellate Court's decision sets forth the following relevant fac......
-
Mierzejewski v. Brownell
...of circumstances, where its conclusion could not reasonably be reached." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Stefanoni v. Duncan, 92 Conn.App. 172, 184, 883 A.2d 1271 (2005), rev'd in part on other grounds, 282 Conn. 686, 923 A.2d 737 (2007). "The sifting and weighing of evidence is peculia......
-
Deane v. Kahn, No. X03 CV 01 0522640S (CT 2/2/2006)
...the need for the court to evaluate the riparian utilization of the plaintiff's property, both past and future. Stefanoni v. Duncan, 92 Conn.App. 172, 191-94, 883 A.2d 1271 (2005). For purposes of deciding the pending motion only, the court agrees with Deane. In Marshall v. Martin, 107 Conn.......
-
140 Main Street-Derby, LLC v. Clark Development
...of circumstances, where its conclusion could not reasonably be reached." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Stefanoni v. Duncan, 92 Conn.App. 172, 184, 883 A.2d 1271 (2005), rev'd in part on other grounds, 282 Conn. 686, 923 A.2d 737 "To establish an easement by prescription in accordance ......
-
2005 Connecticut Appellate Review
...but noted the potentially anomalous result.(fn209) Consequently, the court reviewed the legislative history, 204 Stefanoni v. Duncan, 92 Conn. App. 172, 883 A.2d 1271, cert. granted, 276 Conn. 934, 890 A.2d 573 (defendant's petition), and cert. denied, 276 Conn. 935, 890 A.2d 574 (plaintiff......
-
2005 Connecticut Real Property Law Developments
...at 398. 127 Id. at 394 (quoting the Connecticut Supreme Court's opinion in Coughlin v. Anderson, 270 Conn. 487, 506-507 (2004)). 128 92 Conn. App. 172 (2005), def's cert. granted, 276 Conn. at 934 (2005). riparian or littoral rights appurtenant to the servient estate. The appellate court ac......