Stein v. State
| Decision Date | 24 February 1902 |
| Citation | 67 N.J.L. 481,51 A. 480 |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
| Parties | STEIN v. STATE (KOSTER, Prosecutor). |
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Certiorari by the state, on the prosecution of Peter Koster, against Edith Stein, to review a judgment Affirmed.
Argued November term, 1902, before VAN SYCKEL, FORT, and GARRETSON, JJ.
Weller & Lichtenstein, for plaintiff.
J. Emll Walscbeid, for prosecutor.
This was a certiorari to a district court bringing up a judgment for $150, recovered against the defendant for personal injuries to the plaintiff received through the negligence of the defendant The only objections to the judgment made on the argument were that the plaintiff should have been nonsuited, because no damage was proved by the plaintiff, and no liability shown on the part of the defendant. The facts before us show that the plaintiff was an infant of three months of age, and was in the arms of its mother, who started to go along the sidewalk in front of the defendant's house, and fell over a stone about 15 inches long and 4 inches high, which was kept by the defendant upon the public sidewalk in front of his premises to keep open the gate in his front fence, which gate swung over the sidewalk; that the stone was swept backwards and forwards in the space between the fence and the curb. This was evidence sufficient to go to the jury upon the liability of the defendant. It also appears that when the plaintiff's mother fell with the child in her arms it began to cry; that a doctor was sent for, who set the plaintiff's leg in plaster of paris; that the plaintiff continued to cry for about a week; that the doctor did not come every day; and that there is a lump on the child's leg. This was evidence sufficient to go to the Jury upon the question of the child's injuries and the damages charged to which it was entitled.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wellman v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company
...93 Ala. 518; Armstrong v. Town of Ackley, 71 Iowa 79; King v. City of Oshkosh, 75 Wis. 520; Stephenson v. Flagg, 41 Neb. 373; Stein v. Kaster, 67 N. J. L. 481; Lindeman Brooklyn, etc., Co., 69 A.D. 442; Field v. N. Y., etc., Co., 109 A.D. 831; Glasgow v. Railroad, 191 Mo. 363; Sharp v. Kans......
-
Bailey v. Long
... ... was evidence which tended to disparage some of the ... plaintiff's witnesses, and to attack their testimony; but ... it is not necessary to state it, as the plaintiff is entitled ... to the most favorable construction of the evidence, and, upon ... a motion to nonsuit, we need only consider ... Stein v. Koster, 67 N. J. Law, 481, 51 A ... 480; Denver v. Hyatt, 28 Colo. 129, 63 P. 403 ... The ... question as to whether the ... ...
- Haurahan v. State