Steinke v. Steinke, 84-1337
| Decision Date | 24 January 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 84-1337,84-1337 |
| Citation | 127 Wis.2d 444,379 N.W.2d 853 |
| Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
| Parties | In re the Marriage of Judith M. STEINKE, Petitioner-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Robert Allen STEINKE, Respondent. |
Prior Report: 126 Wis.2d 372, 376 N.W.2d 839.
The motion for reconsideration is denied without costs.
In In re Marriage of Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis.2d 372, 389, 376 N.W.2d 839 (1985), immediately above the mandate, we delete the phrase "the actuarial present value of the entire interest at the time of trial was approximately $15,900."
We add the following sentence immediately above the mandate: An opinion as to actuarial present value was included in the record as an answer to an interrogatory, i.e. $15,900, but was not received in evidence. The amount is not conclusive on remand. The trial court must evaluate and include the interest in the pension in the property division; the parties may introduce evidence of the value of the pension interest.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Whitfield v. Whitfield
...Butcher v. Butcher, 357 S.E.2d 226 (W.Va.1987); Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis.2d 372, 376 N.W.2d 839 (1985), reconsid. den., 127 Wis.2d 444, 379 N.W.2d 853 (1986); Broadhead v. Broadhead, 737 P.2d 731 (Wyo.1987). For these reasons, we have determined that the trial judge erred in relying on B......
-
Cook v. Cook
...[in the pension]." Bloomer v. Bloomer, 84 Wis.2d 124, 129, 267 N.W.2d 235 (1978). ¶18 In Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis.2d 372, 378-79, 376 N.W.2d 839 (1985), 127 Wis.2d 444, 379 N.W.2d 853 (1986) (on reconsideration), the court addressed "the proper characterization of Mr. Steinke's pension p......
-
In re the Marriage of Patrick A. Topolski
...military retirement pay must be considered in dividing the property in a divorce proceeding); Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis.2d 372, 380, 376 N.W.2d 839 (1985), 127 Wis.2d 444, 379 N.W.2d 853 (1986) (on reconsideration) (“[W]e hold that, as a matter of law, the value of a spouse's interest in ......
-
Winiarski v. Winiarski
...illuminate the court's reasoning process. Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis.2d 372, 388, 376 N.W.2d 839, 847 (1985), modified, 127 Wis.2d 444, 379 N.W.2d 853 (1986). Underlying the discretionary decision, however, may be factual determinations and legal questions. If the trial court's decision is......