Stelluti v. Casapenn Enter.s Llc.
Decision Date | 05 August 2010 |
Citation | 203 N.J. 286,1 A.3d 678 |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Parties | Gina STELLUTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CASAPENN ENTERPRISES, LLC, d/b/a Powerhouse Gym, Defendant-Respondent, and ABI Property Partnership, d/b/a Pavilion Center and Star Trac Fitness, Defendants. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
Edward A. Genz argued the cause for appellant (Montenegro, Thompson, Montenegro & Genz, attorneys). Russell S. Massey argued the cause for respondent (Billet & Associates, attorneys; Mr. Massey and Robert Douglas Billet, on the briefs).
E. Drew Britcher, Glen Rock, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae New Jersey Association For Justice (Britcher, Leone & Roth, attorneys; Mr. Britcher and Jessica E. Choper, on the brief).
On January 13, 2004, while participating in a spinning 1 class at a private fitness center, the handlebars on plaintiff Gina Stelluti's spin bike dislodged from the bike, causing her to fall and suffer injuries. In this appeal we must determine whether plaintiff should be bound to a pre-injury waiver of liability that she executed in connection with her membership application and agreement. We conclude, for the reasons expressed herein, that the exculpatory agreement between the fitness center and Stelluti is enforceable as to the injury Stelluti sustained when riding the spin bike. In doing so we reject the argument that limited liability waivers are per se invalid in private fitness center venues. Our decision affirms the Appellate Division judgment that upheld the dismissal of plaintiff's claim.
Stelluti entered into an agreement with defendant Powerhouse Gym 2 for membership at its Brick, New Jersey facility. To do so, she filled out three forms: a “Membership Agreement” form; a “Member Information” form; and a “Health/Safety Consent” form. The “Member Agreement” and “Member Information” forms requested basic personal information. The “Health/Safety Consent” form asked a series of questions about the patron's physical condition, and further, required a patron answering “yes” to any question to submit a doctor's note before commencing physical activity. The form also encouraged patrons to wear “proper footwear and attire,” to ask for assistance with equipment or classes, and to notify the manager if medical assistance was needed.
successors, or assigns, from any and all claims or causes of action and you agree to voluntarily give up or waive any right that you may otherwise have to bring a legal action against the club for personal injury or property damage.
Any patron who declined to sign the waiver was not permitted to use the Powerhouse Gym.
Stelluti's injury occurred at the gym the day that she joined. After signing the requisite paperwork to become a member, she went to participate in a spinning class. She advised the instructor of her inexperience and the instructor helped her to adjust the bike seat for height and showed her how to strap her feet to the pedals. The instructor then told Stelluti to watch and imitate her during the class.
As the class began, the participants started out pedaling in a seated position. Shortly afterward, the instructor told the participants to change from a seated to a standing position on their bikes. When Stelluti rose to a standing position, the handlebars dislodged from the bike. 4 As a result, Stelluti fell forward while her feet remained strapped to the pedals. With assistance, she succeeded in detaching herself from the bike. When she tried to resume participation after resting for fifteen minutes, she soon had to quit, finding herself in too much pain to continue.
Stelluti's injuries included pain in her neck and shoulders, soreness in her thighs and back, a cracked tooth, and bruises on her legs. After a hospital visit, she was diagnosed with back and neck strain, prescribed medication, and discharged with a recommendation for a follow-up appointment with a doctor. She claims also to experience persistent pain as a result of the incident. Her medical expert has stated that three years after her accident Stelluti suffers from chronic pain associated with myofascial pain syndrome. 5
Stelluti filed a timely complaint for damages in the Law Division against Powerhouse; Star Trac, the manufacturer of the spin bikes used at Powerhouse; and ABI Property Partnership, the premises owner. The complaint alleged the following negligence claims against Powerhouse and ABI: 1) “fail[ing] to properly maintain and set up the stationary bike”; 2) “fail [ing] to properly instruct the plaintiff as to how to use the bike [or] exercise proper care”; 3) “caus[ing] a dangerous and hazardous condition to exist”; 4) “allow[ing] a nuisance to exist”; 5) “fail [ing] to provide proper safeguards or warnings on the bike”; 6) “fail[ing] to provide proper and safe equipment”; 7) “maintain[ing] the bike in an unsafe, hazardous and/or defective manner”; and 8) acting in “a negligent, careless and reckless manner so as to cause an unsafe hazardous and/or defective condition to exist ... [and failing] to provide proper safeguards and/or warnings.” Plaintiff also asserted a products liability claim against Star Trac Fitness. 6
This appeal comes to us from a summary judgment record. That record reveals the following contrasting views about the spin bike that was involved in Stelluti's fall and resultant injuries.
Powerhouse submitted an expert liability report that described the mechanics of a Star Trac Fitness Johnny G. Spinner Pro bike. According to that expert's examination of an exemplar bike, 7 the handlebars have a chrome stem post and the entire, unitary piece-handlebars and post-may be detached and separated from the bike frame. The chrome post, which is approximately seven inches tall, contains seven elevation positioning holes, each approximately three-quarters of an inch apart. At the lower end of the post, a horizontal line and arrow, pointing down to the word “Maximum,” indicates the furthest extension point of the post. However, Powerhouse's expert opined that an inexperienced user “would not notice th[at] mark.” The chrome post fits into a vertical support member that extends from the bike's frame base. A locking pin-a threaded rod fitted with a spring-loaded pin and handle-secures the post to the frame. The pin is inserted into one of the elevation holes and is locked into place by tightening its handle. The expert noted that there is “no noticeable difference” between the appearance of the post when it is locked in place or when the post merely is resting on top of an elevation locking pin. Powerhouse's expert concluded that plaintiff's accident “occurred because the handlebars present on the stationary exercise bicycle that she was using unexpectedly and without warning separated from the bicycle causing her to fall.”
Stelluti's liability expert, a college professor with an advanced degree in physical education and certifications in specialized fitness activities including spinning instruction, issued a report that opined that Powerhouse was “negligent in providing a safe environment” and,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Vitale v. Schering-Plough Corp.
...subject to the general principle that parties "are afforded the liberty to bind themselves as they see fit." Stelluti v. Casapenn Enters., LLC, 203 N.J. 286, 302, 1 A.3d 678 (2010) ; see also Rudbart v. N. Jersey Dist. Water Supply Comm'n, 127 N.J. 344, 353, 605 A.2d 681 (1992) ("[T]he basi......
-
Copeland v. Healthsouth/Methodist Rehab. Hosp., LP
...396, 794 P.2d 710, 713 (1990) ; Barnes v. N.H. Karting Ass'n, 128 N.H. 102, 509 A.2d 151, 154 (1986) ; Stelluti v. Casapenn Enters., LLC , 203 N.J. 286, 1 A.3d 678, 688–90 (2010) ; Princetel, LLC v. Buckley , 95 A.D.3d 855, 944 N.Y.S.2d 191, 193 (2012) ; Hyatt v. Mini Storage on the Green ,......
-
Pareja v. Princeton Int'l Props.
...of premises liability: when business owners exercise due care, there are fewer accidents ...." Stelluti v. Casapenn Enters., LLC, 203 N.J. 286, 326, 1 A.3d 678 (2010) (Albin, J., dissenting). The costs of preventable injuries are borne not just by the victim but also "by society in many dif......
-
Weisfelner v. Blavatnik (In re Lyondell Chem. Co.)
...Prabhudas ") (evaluating enforceability of liquidated damages clause under Pennsylvania law); Stelluti v. Casapenn Enterprises, LLC, 203 N.J. 286, 300–301, 1 A.3d 678, 687–688 (2010) ("Stelluti ") (enforcing exculpatory clause in contract under New Jersey law); Orion Refining Corp. v. UOP, ......
-
Extreme Sports Challenge The Courts
...form that must be signed before engaging in the desired activity. This fact gives some courts pause. See Stelluti v. Casapenn Enters., LLC, 1 A.3d 678, 688 (N.J. 2010) (discussing the fact that a fitness club exculpatory agreement was a contract of adhesion due to its "take-it-or-leave-it b......
-
Giving And Receiving: Insuring Company-Sponsored Volunteerism?
...in expressing the intent of the subscribing parties.'") (original emphasis deleted). See, e.g., Stelluti v. Casapenn Enterprises, LLC, 1 A.3d 678 (N.J. 2010) (business's limitation of liability for negligence that arises from patron's voluntary use of exercise equipment is enforceable and n......
-
PERSONAL NEGLIGENCE. DEFENDANT'S VERDICT
...the plaintiff would be required to show that the referee acted in a grossly negligent manner. Stelluti v. Casapenn Enterprises, LLC, 203 N.J. 286, 300 (2010). The defendant contended that the incident occurred when the ball was being passed to the plaintiff and that the goalie acted appropr......
-
PREMISES LIABILITY. Fall Down. $______ RECOVERY
...the plaintiff would be required to show that the referee acted in a grossly negligent manner. Stelluti v. Casapenn Enterprises, LLC, 203 N.J. 286, 300 (2010). The defendant contended that the incident occurred when the ball was being passed to the plaintiff and that the goalie acted appropr......