Stengel v. Medtronic Inc., No. 10–17755.
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | W. FLETCHER |
| Citation | 704 F.3d 1224 |
| Parties | Richard STENGEL; Mary Lou Stengel, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. MEDTRONIC INCORPORATED, a foreign corporation, Defendant–Appellee. |
| Docket Number | No. 10–17755. |
| Decision Date | 10 January 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
249 practice notes
-
McConologue v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., Civil Action No. 3:13–CV–00880 VLB.
...preempt parallel claims under state law based on a medical device manufacturer's violation of federal law”); Stengel v. Medtronic Inc., 704 F.3d 1224, 1228 (9th Cir.2013) (“the MDA does not preempt a state-law claim for violating a state-law duty that parallels a federal-law duty under the ......
-
In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg., Case No. 17–md–02777–EMC
...such preemption where a state requirement falls within (i.e. , does not exceed) a federal requirement. See Stengel v. Medtronic, Inc. , 704 F.3d 1224, 1231 (9th Cir. 2013). Regarding obstacle preemption, a court "discern[s] congressional objectives by ‘examining the federal statute as a who......
-
Bruton v. Gerber Prods. Co., Case No.: 12–CV–02412–LHK
...burden of overcoming the starting presumption that Congress does not intend to supplant state law.” Stengel v. Medtronic Inc., 704 F.3d 1224, 1227 (9th Cir.2013) (en banc) (internal quotation marks omitted). Defendants argue that, to the extent that Bruton seeks to enforce labeling rules th......
-
Mize v. Mentor Worldwide LLC, 2d Civil No. B295829
...duty." ( Jacob v. Mentor Worldwide, LLC (C.D.Cal. 2019) 393 F.Supp.3d 912, 925 ; see also Stengel v. Medtronic, Inc. (9th Cir. 2013) 704 F.3d 1224, 1233 ( Stengel ).) California law recognizes a manufacturer's duty to warn the FDA of adverse events. 51 Cal.App.5th 863 ( Coleman , supra , 22......
Request a trial to view additional results
249 cases
-
McConologue v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., Civil Action No. 3:13–CV–00880 VLB.
...preempt parallel claims under state law based on a medical device manufacturer's violation of federal law”); Stengel v. Medtronic Inc., 704 F.3d 1224, 1228 (9th Cir.2013) (“the MDA does not preempt a state-law claim for violating a state-law duty that parallels a federal-law duty under the ......
-
In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg., Case No. 17–md–02777–EMC
...such preemption where a state requirement falls within (i.e. , does not exceed) a federal requirement. See Stengel v. Medtronic, Inc. , 704 F.3d 1224, 1231 (9th Cir. 2013). Regarding obstacle preemption, a court "discern[s] congressional objectives by ‘examining the federal statute as a who......
-
Barone v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc., 6:17-CV-06877 EAW
...the MDA." A.F. By & Through Fogel v. Sorin Grp. USA, Inc. , 346 F.Supp.3d 534, 541 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting Stengel v. Medtronic Inc. , 704 F.3d 1224, 1233 (9th Cir. 2013) ). Here, Plaintiff alleges that B & L is liable for state common law torts based upon the violation of a FDA regulation......
-
Bruton v. Gerber Prods. Co., Case No.: 12–CV–02412–LHK
...burden of overcoming the starting presumption that Congress does not intend to supplant state law.” Stengel v. Medtronic Inc., 704 F.3d 1224, 1227 (9th Cir.2013) (en banc) (internal quotation marks omitted). Defendants argue that, to the extent that Bruton seeks to enforce labeling rules th......
Request a trial to view additional results