Stephens v. State
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Brooks |
| Citation | Stephens v. State, 85 S.W. 797, 12 Tex. Ct. Rep. 443 (Tex. Crim. App. 1905) |
| Decision Date | 22 February 1905 |
| Parties | STEPHENS v. STATE. |
Appeal from Hall County Court; J. F. Bradley, Judge.
Bob Stephens was convicted of giving liquor to a minor, and appeals. Affirmed.
Howard Martin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Appellant was convicted of giving liquor to a minor in a local option territory, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25.
The undisputed testimony shows that the local option law was in force in Hall county at the time of the gift. Appellant insists that the law prohibiting the sale of intoxicants to minors had been suspended in said county by reason of the adoption of the local option law. This contention seems to be supported by Atkinson v. State, 79 S. W. 31, 9 Tex. Ct. Rep. 756, so far as the sale of intoxicants to minors is concerned. But we take it that the law prohibiting the giving of intoxicants to minors has not been suspended; nor is it inconsistent with the local option law. This court has held that it is unconstitutional for the Legislature to authorize the inhibition of the gift...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Tompkins v. State
...option is in force. The violation is of the local option law, and not of the statute prohibiting sales to minors. In Stephens v. State, 85 S. W. 797, 12 Tex. Ct. Rep. 443, it was held that the local option law did not infringe the statute denouncing an offense against a party who gave intox......