Stephenson Brick Co. v. United States, 9302.

Decision Date15 March 1940
Docket NumberNo. 9302.,9302.
CitationStephenson Brick Co. v. United States, 110 F.2d 360 (5th Cir. 1940)
PartiesSTEPHENSON BRICK CO. v. UNITED STATES ex rel. and for Use of TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. UNITED STATES ex rel. and for Use of TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY v. STEPHENSON BRICK CO.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

J. T. Stokely, of Birmingham, Ala., for appellant and cross-appelleeStephenson Brick Co.

William C. Fitts, Jr., General Counsel, Tennessee Valley Authority, of Knoxville, Tenn., and H.James Hitching, Asst. General Counsel, Tennessee Valley Authority, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellee and cross-appellant.

Before SIBLEY, HUTCHESON, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is a proceeding by the United States to condemn land of Stephenson Brick Company lying along the south bank of the Tennessee River at Decatur, Alabama, under the Act of May 18, 1933, Sect. 25,48 Stat. 70,16 U.S.C.A. § 831x.Commissioners took evidence and fixed a sum to be paid for the property taken.Their finding was appealed to three district judges who fixed a sum of $97,500.This judgment has been appealed by both parties to this court under Section 25 of the Act.Upon considering the record and the argument we find that the land taken is a part of a larger tract which at the time of the taking was used as a unit for a brick manufacturing plant and that the severance of the part taken did destroy the usefulness and value of the plant, so that what remained had the value only of disorganized land and buildings, and the machinery comprised in the plant had only the value of such second-hand property.The owner is entitled to be compensated not only for the separate value of the land taken, but also for the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • United States v. Honolulu Plantation Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • April 24, 1950
    ...372, 45 S.Ct. 115, 69 L.Ed. 328; Sharp v. United States, 191 U.S. 341, 354-355, 24 S.Ct. 114, 48 L.Ed. 211. 17 Stephenson Brick Co. v. United States, 5 Cir., 110 F.2d 360. The local rule in Hawaii as to valuation of land and improvements separately in certain situations has no effect upon t......
  • United States v. Smith
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • April 11, 1966
    ...376, 63 S.Ct. 276, 87 L.Ed. 336; International Paper Company v. United States, 5 Cir. 1955, 227 F.2d 201, 205; Stephenson Brick Co. v. United States, 5 Cir. 1940, 110 F.2d 360. The burden of proving both elements of damage was upon the Hendersons as owners of the land taken. United States e......
  • Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp., Application of
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • December 10, 1965
    ...would be enjoyed by a sole owner of the business' (1 Bonbright, Valuation of Property, 247 [1st Ed. 1937]).5 Stephenson Brick Co. v. United States, 110 F.2d 360 (C.C.A., 5th); Borough of Hanover v. Hanover Sewer Co., 251 Pa. 95, 96 A. 132; Matter of Board of Water Supply of City of New York......
  • United States v. 26.81 Acres of Land, More or Less
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Arkansas
    • August 30, 1965
    ...affect market value.' McCandless v. United States, 298 U.S. 342, 345, 56 S.Ct. 764, 765, 80 L.Ed. 1205. See also Stephenson Brick Co. v. United States, 5 Cir., 110 F.2d 360, 361; Grand River Dam Authority v. Thompson, 10 Cir., 118 F.2d 242, 244, 245; 18 Am.Jur., Eminent Domain, Sec. The cou......
  • Get Started for Free