Stern v. City of Fargo
Decision Date | 19 June 1909 |
Citation | 122 N.W. 403,18 N.D. 289 |
Court | North Dakota Supreme Court |
Appeal from District Court, Cass county; Pollock, J.
Action by Max Stern to enjoin the city of Fargo, and the Mayor and Auditor thereof, from issuing bonds voted for the construction of a pumping station and electric light plant. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
Reversed with directions to enter a decree in accordance with a prayer of the complaint.
Reversed.
E. H Wright, for appellant.
Substantial compliance with law essential to a valid issue of municipal bonds. Harris on Municipal Bonds, 28.
The submission of two propositions in such form as to preclude a vote on each, renders the election void. People v Baker 23 P. 364; City of Denver v. Hagues 63 P. 311; State v. Budge, 14 N.D. 532; 105 N.W. 724. Wilkins v. Waynsboro, 116 Ga. 359; 42 S.E. 767; McBryde v. City of Montesano, 34 P. 559; Truelson v. Duluth, 63 N.W. 714; Neelburn v. Cuthburt, 23 S.E. 206; Cain v. Smith, 44 S.E. 5; Supervisors v. Ry. Co., 21 Ill. 337; Gray v. Mount, 45 Ia. 591; Hensly v. City of Hamilton, 36 Ohio Cir. Ct. R. 201.
W. C. Resser, City Att'y and Engerud, Holt & Frame, for Respondent.
If the purpose of the bond issue is single, and the enterprise a unit, although evolving two results, waterworks and electric light plant, the practice is upheld. Truelson v. City, 63 N.W. 714; Woodbridge v. City, 59 N.W. 296; State ex rel. v. Caffery, 22 So. 756; Heilburn v. Cuthburt, 23 S.E. 206; Ryan v. Orbison, 7 Ohio Cir. Ct. 30; Coleman v. Town, 47 So. 703; Kemp v. Hazelhurst, 31 So. 908.
A mark on a ballot not violating the spirit of the election law, does not nullify the vote. Howser v. Pepper, 8 N.D. 484; 79 N.W. 1018; Perry v. Hackney, 11 N.D. 148; 90 N.W. 483.
Section 130 of the Constitution of this state requires the legislative assembly to restrict the powers of municipal corporations as to levying taxes and assessments, borrowing money and contracting debts, and prohibits the diversion of money raised by taxation, loan, or assessment for any purpose, to any other purpose, except by authority of law. Section 183 provides that the debt of any municipality shall never exceed 5 per centum upon the value of the taxable property therein, but permits any incorporated city, by a two-thirds vote, to increase such indebtedness 3 per cent. on such assessed valuation beyond said 5 per cent. limit, and provides that any incorporated city may become indebted in any amount not exceeding 4 per centum of such assessed valuation, without regard to the existing indebtedness of such city, for the purpose of constructing or purchasing waterworks for furnishing a supply of water to the inhabitants of such city, or for the purpose of constructing sewers, and for no other purpose whatever.
The legislative assembly, in chapter 30 of the Political Code, commencing with section 2632, Rev. Codes 1905, has provided for the organization and incorporation of cities. Article 4 of said chapter, commencing with section 2678, enumerates the general powers of city councils in 78 paragraphs or articles. Paragraph 5 gives it power to borrow money on the credit of the corporation, for corporation purposes, and to issue bonds therefor in such amounts and forms, and on such conditions, as it shall prescribe, and provides that no such city shall become indebted in any manner, or for any purpose, to an amount, including existing indebtedness, exceeding 5 per cent. of the taxable property therein. Then follows the proviso, contained in the section of the Constitution, quoted, relating to an increase of such indebtedness, on a two-thirds vote, of 3 per cent., and the further proviso quoted relating to indebtedness in any amount, not exceeding 4 per cent., for the purpose of constructing or purchasing waterworks, with the additional power to issue bonds therefor, and the further proviso that the city, before or at the time of issuing any of the bonds mentioned, or incurring the indebtedness for which the same are to be issued, shall provide for a direct annual tax sufficient to pay the interest on such debt or bonds when it falls due, and to pay and discharge the principal when the same becomes due, and that such provisions shall be irrepealable until such debt is paid. The final paragraph of the section provides "further that none of the hereinbefore mentioned bonds shall be issued, either for special or general purposes, except as by law otherwise provided unless at an election, after twenty days' notice in a newspaper published in the city stating the purpose for which such bonds are to be issued, and the amount thereof, the legal voters of said city, shall, by a majority vote, determine in favor of issuing such bonds." Paragraph 11 of section 2678 gives the council power to provide for the lighting of streets, and to provide for the furnishing of lights to the inhabitants of the city, and paragraph 75 to purchase and erect, lease, rent, manage, and maintain any system, or part of system, of waterworks, hydrants, and supply of water, telegraphing, fire signals, or fire apparatus that may be of use in the prevention and extinguishment of fires, and to pass all ordinances, penal or otherwise, that shall be necessary for the full protection, maintenance, management, and control of the property so leased, purchased, or erected.
The city council of Fargo passed, and the mayor approved, on the 1st day of March, 1909, a resolution as follows:
And the city auditor, in the notice for the annual election of the city of Fargo, included the following notice:
The question so submitted received more than a majority of the votes cast on the subject of bonds at such election, and thereafter the city council passed, and the mayor approved an ordinance providing for the issuance of such bonds. The ballot contained the question, "Shall the city of Fargo issue $ 100,000.00 or such part thereof as may be required, in bonds of said city?" reciting the denominations, dates of payment, rate of interest, and the purposes stated in the resolution. The appellant brought this action, setting out these facts, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Weiderholt v. Lisbon Special School District No. 19
... ... 180; State ex rel. Laird v. Gang, 10 N.D. 331, 87 ... N.W. 5; Pine Tree Lumber Co. v. Fargo, 12 N.D. 360, ... 96 N.W. 357; Nofire v. United States, 164 U.S. 657, ... 41 L.Ed. 588, 17 S.Ct ... Comp ... Laws 1913, § 1140; State ex rel. Laird v. Gang, ... 10 N.D. 331; Stern v. Fargo, 18 N.D. 289; State ... ex rel. Minihan v. Nyers, 19 N.D. 804; Pronovost v ... ...
-
Weiderholt v. Lisbon Special School District No. 19
... ... Fargo, 18 N.D. 296 ... It is ... not mere matter of lapse of time, but change of ... may be briefly stated as follows: ... The ... school district of the city of Lisbon is known as special ... school district No. 19, and, prior to the annexation ... ...
-
Stiehm v. Guthrie Farmers' Elevator Co.
... ... N.D. 114, 64 N.W. 110; Brown County v. Aberdeen, 4 ... Dak. 402, 31 N.W. 735; Stern v. Fargo, 18 N.D. 289, ... 26 L.R.A. (N.S.) 665, 122 N.W. 403; State ex rel. Flaherty v ... ...