Stern v. Stern, 8764.

Decision Date29 January 1945
Docket NumberNo. 8764.,8764.
PartiesSTERN v. STERN et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

Mr. Leon Tobriner, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Mr. Levi H. David, of Washington, D. C., for appellee Cecelia Stern.

Mr. Hymen Stern, pro se.

Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and EDGERTON and ARNOLD, Associate Justices.

PER CURIAM.

The question is whether the following corporate by-law prevents a stockholder from disposing of his stock by will: "The stock of this company shall be deemed personal property and shall only be transferred in the following manner, and not otherwise, that is to say, it shall first be offered to the corporation, and in the event the corporation shall not within five days from the date of said offer agree to purchase the same, then it shall be offered to the stockholders of the corporation, and if none of said stockholders agree to purchase the same within five days from the date of said offer, the holder of said stock is then privileged to sell the same. The purchaser or purchasers of said stock sold as aforesaid shall likewise be bound by this condition and shall be required to comply with the same before the stock may be transferred and assigned upon the books of this company." We agree with the District Court in answering the question in the negative. The requirement that stock shall first be offered to the corporation and then to the stockholders before it is transferred obviously means that the stockholder must make these offers before he voluntarily transfers his stock, not that he must make them before he dies. The bylaw does not apply to the situation which arises when, because of a stockholder's death, transmission or devolution of his shares is inevitable. We need not consider whether, in its intended application to a voluntary transfer, the by-law is sufficiently definite for enforcement and is valid; cf. Uniform Stock Transfer Act, made applicable in the District of Columbia by Act of Congress of Dec. 23, 1944, c. 729, Sec. 15, 58 Stat. 930.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Kerr v. Porvenir Corp.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • December 27, 1994
    ...333 F.2d 413, 415 (2d Cir.1964) (applying New York law), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 969, 85 S.Ct. 666, 13 L.Ed.2d 562 (1965); Stern v. Stern, 146 F.2d 870 (D.C.Cir.1945); In re Estate of Riggs, 36 Colo.App. 302, 540 P.2d 361, 363 (1975); Elson v. Security State Bank, 246 Iowa 601, 67 N.W.2d 525......
  • Lehtinen v. Drs. Lehtinen, Mervart & West
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • June 4, 2003
    ...260; Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. N. Attleborough Chapter of Am. Red Cross (1953), 330 Mass. 114, 111 N.E.2d 447; Stern v. Stern (C.A.D.C.1945), 146 F.2d 870; 18A American Jurisprudence 2d (1985) 572-573, Corporations, Section 694; 18 Corpus Juris Secundum, supra, Corporations, Sectio......
  • Mathews v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • February 26, 1964
    ...and sons from his own corporation and intimated, gratuitously, that they also took free of the first refusal. Cf. Stern v. Stern, 1945, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 340, 146 F.2d 870 (no indication stock "free" in hands of legatee); In the Matter of Trilling & Montague, Inc., E.D.Pa. 1956, 140 F.Supp. 2......
  • Lehtinen Exr. v. Drs. Lehtinen, Mervart & West, Inc.
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • June 4, 2003
    ...F.Supp. 260; Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. N. Attleborough Chapter of Am. Red Cross, 330 Mass. 114, 111 N.E.2d 447; Stern v. Stern (C.A.D.C.1945), 146 F.2d 870; 18A American Jurisprudence 2d 572-573, Corporations, Section 694; 18 Corpus Juris Secundum, supra, Corporations, Section 220 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT