Stevens v. Hawkins

Decision Date16 January 1919
Docket Number6 Div. 858
Citation202 Ala. 499,80 So. 801
PartiesSTEVENS, Treasurer, v. HAWKINS, Tax Collector.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Hugh A. Locke, Judge.

Action between Frank Stevens, as Treasurer, etc., and James F Hawkins, as Tax Collector, etc. Decree for the latter, and the former appeals. Affirmed.

Fred G Moore and Jerre C. King, both of Birmingham, for appellant.

E.N Hamill, of Birmingham, for appellee.

THOMAS J.

The question for decision is whether the tax assessor is entitled to commissions on the "three-mill school tax fund" collected in Jefferson county.

The constitutional amendment was adopted at the general election in November, 1916, pursuant to the act of March 17, 1915, and the Enabling Act of September 10, 1915 (Gen.Acts 1915, pp 107, 360). By the former is provided the power of the several counties of the state (so declaring, as was provided by the amendment) "to levy and collect a special county tax not exceeding thirty cents on each one hundred dollars worth of taxable property in such counties in addition to that now authorized or that may hereafter be authorized" for public schools (section 1); and it is further provided that the funds arising from this source--county or district--shall be expended for the exclusive benefit of the county or district, as the law may direct (page 108, § 3).

The enabling act provided for elections to authorize any county and any school district, now existing or hereafter formed in any county, to levy and collect a special tax for public school purposes, not exceeding 30 cents on each $100 worth of taxable property in such county and in such school district; and, if it appears as the result of such election that a majority of those voting in said election voted for such taxation, "the court of county commissioners or other governing body, shall levy said special tax and cause the tax assessor to assess the same on the taxable property in said county, or in said school district, as the case may be." Gen.Acts 1915, pp. 360, 362, § 4. Section 5 provides that--

"Whenever such a levy as is provided for in this act is made, it shall be the duty of the tax collector within and for that county to collect such a tax in the same manner and under the same requirements and laws as the taxes of the state are collected, and he shall keep said amount separate and apart from all other funds and keep a clear and distinct account thereof showing what amount is paid and turn the same over to the county treasurer of public school funds, whose duty it shall be to receipt therefor and pay out the same on monthly pay rolls with the authority and approval of the county board of education, upon uniform blanks prescribed by the state superintendent of education; provided that the funds arising from levying the special tax for school purposes in any school district, shall be used for the exclusive benefit of the public schools of such district; and in the case of incorporated cities and towns shall be paid over to the treasurer of said incorporated city or town, to be used for the exclusive benefit thereof."

Thereafter, on September 14, 1915, the Revenue Act, "To provide for the assessment, valuation and equalization of values of real and personal property for taxation," etc., was approved. Gen.Acts 1915, pp. 386-488. A reference to the Journals of the Legislature discloses the fact that the enabling act adverted to bore a number, H. 1428, that would indicate its introduction in the House subsequent to the Revenue Act, No. H. 850, and that the latter act was approved by the Governor four days after his approval of the enabling act; and that both bills were pending in the Legislature at the same time.

The Revenue Act carried into it section 2097 of the Code of 1907, with the proviso that--

"After the expiration of the present terms of tax assessors, no commission shall be allowed or received on any assessments of any local or special county school taxes." Gen.Acts 1915, pp. 401, 402, § 27.

A like provision is found in section 149, p. 448, as to the compensation of tax collectors. Thus the Revenue Act was made to refer to the three-mill school tax, and the Enabling Act relating thereto, for the then terms of tax assessors and collectors.

The commissions of tax assessors theretofore were fixed by statute on state taxes, whether general or special, assessed by them at the rate indicated in the statute; and "the same rate of commissions on the amount of county taxes, whether general or special (but not on each separately), regularly assessed, carried up or extended on the assessment book, giving duplicate receipts to the tax collector for all amounts so paid him," was allowed. Code 1907, § 2097. The same rate of commissions was fixed by section 27 of the Revenue Act (Gen.Acts 1915, pp. 401, 402), with the proviso, hereinbefore set out, extending the allowance of commissions to that official to "the expiration of the present terms of tax assessors," so limiting it as not to extend to or be allowed "on any assessments of any local or special county school taxes" after the expiration of such terms.

The statute of force at the date of the adoption of the Revenue Act (Gen.Acts 1915) made it a part of the duties of tax...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Weakley v. Henry
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 30 Junio 1920
    ...or whatever benefit the county may derive therefrom, unless expressly, or by necessary implication, authorized by law. Stevens v. Hawkins, 202 Ala. 499, 80 So. 801, 802; Ensley Motor Car Co. v. O'Rear, supra; Davis Curtis, 192 Ala. 64, 67, 68 So. 419; Mobile County v. Williams, 180 Ala. 639......
  • Jefferson County v. Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 16 Enero 1919

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT