Stevens v. Reynolds

Decision Date08 November 1895
Docket Number17,242
Citation41 N.E. 931,143 Ind. 467
PartiesStevens et al. v. Reynolds
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

Petition for Rehearing Overruled January 24, 1896.

From the Clay Circuit Court.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded, with instructions to grant leave to reform the issues if the appellee shall desire to amend his complaint.

G. C Moore, for appellants.

S C Stimson, R. B. Stimson, H. A. Condit and A. M. Higgins, for appellee.

OPINION

McCabe, J.

The appellee sued the appellants in the superior court of Vigo county, for partition of, and to quiet title to, certain real estate in the complaint described as situate in said county, consisting of an eighty acre tract of land. The venue was changed to the Clay Circuit Court. The superior court sustained a demurrer to the first, and overruled a demurrer to the second paragraph of the complaint. And the circuit court sustained a demurrer to the second paragraph of the separate answer of appellant Margaret A. Stevens. A special finding of the facts having been made on proper request, the court stated its conclusions of law thereon, overruled appellants' motion for a new trial, and rendered judgment, quieting appellee's title in and to one undivided half of said real estate after the court had defaulted the defendant Crawford, and ordered partition. There was no error in sustaining the demurrer to the second paragraph of the separate answer of appellant Margaret A. Stevens, because it was nothing more than a special denial of certain specific facts stated in the complaint, without which the plaintiff could not recover, her first paragraph of answer being a general denial of all the facts stated in the complaint. There was no need of two denials of the same facts.

The same question arises on the exception to the conclusions of law as arose on the demurrer to the complaint. Therefore, we will consider only the conclusions of law upon the facts found.

The special finding and conclusions of law are as follows:

"On August 26, 1876, Sarah McGrew acquired title to the southeast quarter, northwest quarter, and northeast quarter, southwest quarter, section 17, T. 13 N., R. 7 W., in Vigo county Indiana. On February 25, 1880, said lands were sold as the property of Sarah McGrew to Josiah Locke, by the auditor and treasurer of said county, at private sale, for $ 79.27, as the taxes, penalty and costs of the years 1876, 1877, 1878 and 1879, all previous taxes on said lands having been paid.

"On January 29, 1881, in pursuance of a decree of the circuit court of said county of Vigo, against said Sarah McGrew, the sheriff of said county executed a deed conveying said lands to James M. Parkes, who died intestate seized of the same, leaving his wife, Mary J. Parkes, surviving as his widow.

"On July 11, 1882, tax deeds for said lands were executed by the auditor of said county to Josiah Locke, in pursuance of said tax sale.

"On September 18, 1882, the circuit court of Putnam county, Indiana, in which the settlement of the estate of said James M. Parkes was pending, caused its commissioner, on the petition of the administrator of said estate, to execute a deed for the undivided two-thirds of said lands to the plaintiff James M. Reynolds, and the defendant John L. Stevens, to procure funds to pay the debts of the said estate which was insolvent; and on the same day said widow, Mary J. Parkes, executed a deed conveying to said James M. Reynolds and John L. Stevens the other undivided one-third of said lands, which deeds were duly acknowledged and recorded in the office of the recorder of said county of Vigo, April 9, 1884, by which conveyances said James M. Reynolds and John L. Stevens became each the owner of an undivided half of said lands as tenants in common.

"On March 29, 1884, said John L. Stevens, and the defendant Margaret A. Stevens his wife, conveyed their undivided half of said lands to their son-in-law Frank H. Eaton, by warranty deed, which was acknowledged and recorded in the office of said recorder, April 9, 1884.

"On April 21, 1884, said Eaton and his wife, by their warranty deed, conveyed said undivided half of said lands to said Margaret A. Stevens, which deed was acknowledged and recorded in the office of said recorder, December 10, 1885, by which deed the said Margaret A. Stevens became the owner of an undivided half interest in said lands as a tenant in common with said James M. Reynolds.

"On July 3, 1884, said Josiah Locke filed his complaint in the superior court of said county of Vigo, to quiet his title by virtue of said tax deed, making parties defendant thereto said James M. Reynolds, John L. Stevens, Frank H. Eaton and others, not including said Margaret A. Stevens.

"On March 2, 1885, said Locke and his wife conveyed said lands by quitclaim deed to Stoughton J. Fletcher and Francis M. Churchman, which deed was acknowledged and recorded in the office of said recorder April 11, 1885.

"On June 4, 1885, on suggestion of the death of said Josiah Locke, said Fletcher and Churchman were substituted as plaintiffs in said action; and the defendants, not having appeared, were defaulted, and thereupon a judgment was rendered against them quieting the title of said Fletcher and Churchman. The said James M. Reynolds, John L. Stevens, and Frank H. Eaton were notified of the pendency of said action to quiet title, as non-resident defendants, by publication and not otherwise, and said James M. Reynolds had no actual knowledge or notice of such proceedings until after the rendition of said judgment, nor until in the spring of 1891. Notice by publication was ordered on motion and affidavit that after diligent inquiry the residence of said defendants was unknown, but without any proof on non-residence. At the time of said proceedings said James M. Reynolds resided in Tippecanoe county, Indiana, John L. Stevens resided in Putnam county, Indiana, and Frank H. Eaton resided in Clay county, Indiana, and their respective places of residence were shown in their title deeds then on record as aforesaid. Said Reynolds has ever since continued to reside in said Tippecanoe county, in the city of Lafayette; said John L. Stevens and Margaret A. Stevens removed to Terre Haute in Vigo county, in December, 1884, and resided there three years.

"At the time James M. Reynolds and John L. Stevens acquired title to said lands as aforesaid, September 18, 1882, John R. Brown was in possession of the same as the tenant of said James M. Parkes for a cash rental of $ 75.00 a year, which had been paid for the year 1882. Said Brown attorney to said Reynolds and Stevens and agreed to pay $ 75.00 rent for the year 1883, and $ 100.00 a year thereafter. Said Reynolds thereupon left the management of said common property to said co-tenant John L. Stevens, who was also in custody of their title deeds, and said Reynolds knowing nothing of said tax encumbrance, and relying upon his co-tenant to collect and apply the rents for their mutual interest, learned nothing of said proceedings to quiet title, nor of said conveyance to Frank H. Eaton and Margaret A. Stevens, nor of the facts hereinafter stated until 1891.

"In November, 1886, said Margaret A. Stevens without the knowledge of said James M. Reynolds, for the purpose of securing to herself the title to the entire interest in said lands, and designing thereby to oust her said co-tenant, by John E. Stevens, her son and agent, entered into negotiations with said Fletcher and Churchman for the redemption of said lands from the encumbrance of said tax sales, tax deeds, and decree quieting title; said agent falsely represented himself as the agent of said James M. Reynolds and other defendants in said proceeding to quiet title, and induced said Fletcher and Churchman to consent to such redemption in consideration of the payment of $ 304.00, the estimated sum of the taxes, interest, penalty and costs then accrued upon said tax sales, and including nothing additional thereto except taxes paid on said land by said Fletcher and Churchman subsequent to said decree. Said lands were at the time worth $ 5,000 00, and were held by said Fletcher and Churchman at $ 8,000.00; but they were induced to permit such redemption, upon the representation that the notice to said defendants was insufficient, that the affidavit upon which the court ordered publication was false in that diligent inquiry was not made to learn their place of residence.

"Upon said consideration and inducement, said Fletcher and Churchman, on March 3, 1887, by the direction of said John E. Stevens, executed their release and quitclaim for the whole of said lands to said Margaret A. Stevens, which deed was recorded in the office of said recorder, March 8, 1887, since which date the said Margaret A. Stevens has claimed the exclusive ownership of said lands.

"On July 14, 1890, said Margaret A. Stevens and said John L. Stevens, her husband, executed their mortgage upon the entirety of said lands to the defendant Charles M. Crawford to secure the payment of three promissory notes for $ 933.33 each, executed by said Margaret A. Stevens, December 16, 1887, to Benjamin B. Briggs, payable in one, two and three years after date, in consideration of which mortgage the payment of said notes was extended to one, two and three years from June 16, 1890.

"Said John L. Stevens collected all the rents of said lands up to May 21, 1884, and appropriated the same to his own use. On May 21, 1884, when his undivided half interest was conveyed to said Margaret, and John L. Stevens collected rents of said John R. Brown previous to the commencement of this action the sum of $ 265 in cash and the sum of $ ----- in labor, in mining coal, as hereinafter stated, and $ in labor, in improving said...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Beavers v. Bess
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • March 24, 1915
    ...the same could be challenged only by a direct attack. Essig v. Lower et al., 120 Ind. 239, 21 N. E. 1090;Stevens et al. v. Reynolds, 143 Ind. 467, 41 N. E. 931, 52 Am. St. Rep. 422;Boyer v. Berryman, 123 Ind. 451, 24 N. E. 249;Friebe v. Elder et al., 105 N. E. 151. [4] The appellate tribuna......
  • Beavers v. Bess
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • March 24, 1915
    ...the requisite jurisdiction, unless it affirmatively appears from the record that it did not have or acquire such jurisdiction." In Stevens v. Reynolds, supra, it held that a defective affidavit or its falsity, upon which a notice by publication was given, will not subject the judgment to a ......
  • Stevens v. Reynolds
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • November 8, 1895

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT