Stevens v. Stevens

Citation72 P. 1060, 31 Colo. 188
Case DateApril 06, 1903
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

72 P. 1060

31 Colo. 188

STEVENS
v.
STEVENS.

Supreme Court of Colorado

April 6, 1903


Appeal from Lake County Court.

Action for divorce between Eugene Stevens and Ophelia Stevens. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to a petition by Eugene Stevens for the modification of the order for alimony and the control of a child, he appeals. Appeal dismissed. [72 P. 1061.]

T. A. Dickson, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the petition of appellant, the purpose of which was to obtain an order modifying an allowance for alimony and the custody and control of a minor child, as fixed by a decree of divorce theretofore rendered between the parties to this action. There is no question involved which gives this court jurisdiction on appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed, and the cause redocketed on error. Section 388a, Mills' Ann. Code.

Appeal dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 practice notes
  • Cormana v. Naron
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Idaho
    • July 5, 1923
    ...8 Ann. Cas. 697, 79 C. C. A. 32, 9 L. R. A., N. S., 1168; Lynde v. Lynde, 181 U.S. 183, 21 S.Ct. 555, 45 L.Ed. 810; Stevens v. Stevens, 31 Colo. 188, 72 P. 1061; Hunt v. Monroe, 32 Utah 428, 91 P. 269, 11 L. R. A., N. S., 249; Criteser v. Gaffey (Tex.) 222 S.W. 193; Page v. Page, 189 Mass. ......
  • Hunt v. Monroe, 1839
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Utah
    • June 29, 1907
    ...of such judgments in the state of Colorado, as declared by the Supreme Court of that state in the case of Stevens v. Stevens, 72 P. 1061, 31 Colo. 188. Whether the law still remains so we are not advised. Respondent's counsel, however, contend that, although the judgment required the alimon......
  • Ruge v. Ruge, 13681.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • June 19, 1917
    ...which we have already reviewed. In addition the following cases are cited upon which we shall comment in passing: Stevens v. Stevens, 31 Colo. 188, 72 P. 1061. The entire opinion in that case is as follows: 'By virtue of the general equity powers of a granting a divorce, as well as by virtu......
  • Weston v. Weston, 11485.
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court of Colorado
    • December 6, 1926
    ...P. 944; Willoughby v. Willoughby, 71 Colo. 356, 360, 206 P. 792; Huff v. Huff, 77 Colo. 15, [80 Colo. 325] 234 P. 167; Stevens v. Stevens, 31 Colo. 188, 72 P. 1061; Prewitt v. Prewitt, 52 Colo. 522, 122 P. 766; Diegel v. Diegel, 73 Colo. 330, 215 P. 143; Jewel v. Jewel, 71 Colo. 470, 207 P.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
  • Cormana v. Naron
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Idaho
    • July 5, 1923
    ...8 Ann. Cas. 697, 79 C. C. A. 32, 9 L. R. A., N. S., 1168; Lynde v. Lynde, 181 U.S. 183, 21 S.Ct. 555, 45 L.Ed. 810; Stevens v. Stevens, 31 Colo. 188, 72 P. 1061; Hunt v. Monroe, 32 Utah 428, 91 P. 269, 11 L. R. A., N. S., 249; Criteser v. Gaffey (Tex.) 222 S.W. 193; Page v. Page, 189 Mass. ......
  • Hunt v. Monroe, 1839
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Utah
    • June 29, 1907
    ...of such judgments in the state of Colorado, as declared by the Supreme Court of that state in the case of Stevens v. Stevens, 72 P. 1061, 31 Colo. 188. Whether the law still remains so we are not advised. Respondent's counsel, however, contend that, although the judgment required the alimon......
  • Ruge v. Ruge, 13681.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • June 19, 1917
    ...which we have already reviewed. In addition the following cases are cited upon which we shall comment in passing: Stevens v. Stevens, 31 Colo. 188, 72 P. 1061. The entire opinion in that case is as follows: 'By virtue of the general equity powers of a granting a divorce, as well as by virtu......
  • Weston v. Weston, 11485.
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court of Colorado
    • December 6, 1926
    ...P. 944; Willoughby v. Willoughby, 71 Colo. 356, 360, 206 P. 792; Huff v. Huff, 77 Colo. 15, [80 Colo. 325] 234 P. 167; Stevens v. Stevens, 31 Colo. 188, 72 P. 1061; Prewitt v. Prewitt, 52 Colo. 522, 122 P. 766; Diegel v. Diegel, 73 Colo. 330, 215 P. 143; Jewel v. Jewel, 71 Colo. 470, 207 P.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT