Stevens v. Stevens

Decision Date06 April 1903
Citation72 P. 1060,31 Colo. 188
PartiesSTEVENS v. STEVENS.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

Appeal from Lake County Court.

Action for divorce between Eugene Stevens and Ophelia Stevens. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to a petition by Eugene Stevens for the modification of the order for alimony and the control of a child, he appeals. Appeal dismissed.

T. A. Dickson, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the petition of appellant, the purpose of which was to obtain an order modifying an allowance for alimony and the custody and control of a minor child, as fixed by a decree of divorce theretofore rendered between the parties to this action. There is no question involved which gives this court jurisdiction on appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed, and the cause redocketed on error. Section 388a, Mills' Ann. Code.

Appeal dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Cormana v. Naron
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Idaho
    • July 5, 1923
    ......Judgment for plaintiff. Affirmed. . . . Judgment affirmed. Costs awarded to respondent. . . J. M. Stevens, for Appellant. . . The. judgment rendered by the Colorado court in the divorce action. is not a final judgment at law and is not ......
  • Hunt v. Monroe
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Utah
    • June 29, 1907
    ...... modification by the court of rendition. (Read v. Read, 28 Utah 297; Whitmore v. Harden, 3 Utah. 121; Stevens v. Stevens [Colo.], 72 P. 1061; Page v. Page, 189 Mass. 85, 4 A. E. Ann. 296.). . . If he. is an agent then of course he cannot sue, we ......
  • Ruge v. Ruge
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • June 19, 1917
    ......In addition the following cases are cited upon. which we shall comment in passing:. . . . Stevens v. Stevens, 31 Colo. 188, 72 P. 1061. The. entire opinion in that case is as follows:. . . 'By virtue of the general equity ......
  • Hall v. Hall
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Colorado
    • November 13, 1939
    ......235] the present decree, in. the property settlement, or in the trust agreement. . . In the. case of Stevens v. Stevens, 31 Colo. 188, 72 P. 1061, we for the first time decided (Mr. Justice Steele. dissenting) that the court has continuing jurisdiction ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT