Stevenson v. Valentine
Decision Date | 17 September 1889 |
Citation | 27 Neb. 338,43 N.W. 107 |
Parties | STEVENSON v. VALENTINE. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Syllabus by the Court.
1. “A person who aids in the conversion of personal property is responsible to the owner for its value.” McCormick v. Stevenson, 13 Neb. 70, 12 N. W. Rep. 828.
2. When at attorney at law or other person acting as agent for another, known to him to be without authority or right, takes possession of the personal property of a deceased person and converts it into money, without administration, he will be liable to the lawful administrator for the value of the property so converted and appropriated, without reference to whether he accounts to the person for whom he acts or not.
3. The evidence examined, and held competent and sufficient to support the findings of the court as set out in the opinion.
Error to district court, Cuming county; POWERS, Judge.M. McLaughlin, for plaintiff in error.
E. K. Valentine, for defendant in error.
This is a proceeding in error to the district court of Cuming county. It was alleged in the petition that defendant in error was the duly appointed and qualified administrator of the estate of B. M. Gay, late of Cuming county, deceased, and that said Gay at the time of his death was possessed of personal property of the value of $4,284.40, the property being described as one drug-store, of the value of $2,400; one horse, phaeton, and harness, of the value of $130; one gun, of the value of $35; cash on hand, of the value of $1,156; and books of account, of the value of $563.40; and that, soon after the death of said Gay, one R. F. Stevenson obtained possession of said goods, chattels, money, and book-accounts, and unlawfully converted the same to his own use, to the damage of plaintiff in the sum named; that afterwards, on the 9th day of March, 1885, the said R. F. Stevenson died testate, and by his will left plaintiff in error as his executrix, who duly qualified and entered upon the duties of said office; that the claims named in the petition had been duly filed in the county court of Cuming county against the estate of said Stevenson, and had been rejected by said court, from which plaintiff in error had duly appealed. There was a prayer for judgment for the sum of $4,265.91, and interest thereon from July 1, 1883. The answer of plaintiff in error consisted of a general denial. The cause was tried to the court without the intervention of a jury, and the trial resulted in the following findings and judgment:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Skinner v. First Nat
...And, if any person aid in the conversion of property, he is responsible to the owner for all damages sustained by him. In Stevenson v. Valentine, 27 Neb. 338, 108, the court “Under the usually adopted principle of law, that he who intermeddles with personal property which is not his own mus......
- English v. Milligan
-
Skinner v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Watertown
...if any person aid in the conversion of property, he is responsible to the owner for all damages sustained by him. In Stevenson v. Valentine, 27 Neb. 338, 43 N. W. 107, 108, the court said: “Under the usually adopted principle of law, that he who intermeddles with personal property which is ......
- Stevenson v. Valentine