Stewart v. The Pennsylvania Company

Decision Date28 January 1892
Docket Number15,469
Citation29 N.E. 916,130 Ind. 242
PartiesStewart, Administratrix, v. The Pennsylvania Company
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

From the Scott Circuit Court.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

W. K Marshall, for appellant.

S Stansifer, for appellee.

OPINION

McBride, J.

While counsel have argued two alleged errors in this case, only one of them is assigned. The one error which is assigned, however, presents, substantially, every question involved in both, and rests on a ruling of the circuit court sustaining a demurrer to the second paragraph of the complaint.

The suit is by the appellant, as administratrix of the estate of William H. Stewart, deceased, who was killed by a train of cars on a line of railroad operated by the appellee.

The paragraph of complaint in question, omitting prefatory and concluding technical averments, is as follows:

"That on the day of -----, 188-, the said William Stewart was in the employ and service of the defendant, in the capacity of bridge carpenter, and that said decedent, on the day last aforesaid, was engaged in said service of said defendant, at and on the Silver Creek bridge, which was a part of defendant's line of said road from Jeffersonville to New Albany; that the trains of defendant, going west on said railroad, ran on the north track, and the returning train ran on the south track, and when said trains were meeting and passing each other there was twenty-five inches, and no more of space between said trains; that it was the custom of the defendant to convey said bridge carpenters, including said Stewart, from Jeffersonville to the place of their work in the morning, and then stop said train for them to get off, and said train stopped only long enough to allow said workmen time to get off, and then reconvey said employees from said place back to Jeffersonville; that said place of stopping was not a place of stopping to receive or disembark passengers, and when said passenger trains stopped to allow said employees to get off the train, they were required to immediately and promptly get off from said train, so as to allow it to proceed on its trip; that the place where said train stopped to disembark said decedent and the other persons with whom he worked was on an embankment twelve feet high, and on the south side of decedent's train there was a broad level -- of fifteen feet width, and on the north side of said train was the slope of the embankment, so close to the train as to afford no convenient opportunity to get off there; that the only convenient, and the usual place for said decedent and his fellow-workmen to get off from said train was on the south side of said train, and was a safe place except when the east bound train on the other track might be passing decedent's train while decedent and the other hands were disembarking, and while said other train was passing it was a dangerous place for said employees to disembark; that the time of starting said east and west bound trains from Jeffersonville was fixed by the defendant, and the defendant had negligently and carelessly failed and neglected to make any rules or regulations for the movement of said east bound train that required the employees running that train to check its speed while passing said west bound train, or that required said crew of hands, or any of them on the east bound train, to signal and give warning of their approach, by ringing the bell or sounding the whistle, but, on the contrary, required said train to run eastward at a rate of thirty-five miles per hour when passing from New Albany to Jeffersonville; that, on the morning of the day last aforesaid, said decedent and his fellow-workmen were conveyed on said defendant's said passenger train to their place of work, and stopped about one hundred yards beyond their tool chest, and decedent immediately proceeded to get off from said train, and was at the door of the car he had been riding in when his train came to a full stop, and went out on the steps of said car to disembark on the south side, and looked to see if there was any approaching train; that the steam and the smoke from the engine belonging to his train settled immediately down on the ground so thick and heavy that he could not and did not see the train approaching from the west, and the steam was escaping from the engine attached to the defendant's train, and made so much noise that decedent could not, and did not, hear the coming train, although he...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Stewart v. Pennsylvania Co.
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • January 28, 1892
    ...130 Ind. 24229 N.E. 916STEWARTv.PENNSYLVANIA CO.Supreme Court of Indiana.Jan. 28, 1892 ... Appeal from circuit court, Scott county; T. C. BATCHELOR, Judge.Action by Louisa J. Stewart, administratrix, against the Pennsylvania Company. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.[29 N.E. 917]William K. Marshall, for appellant. S. Stansifer, for appellee.McBRIDE, J.While counsel have argued two alleged errors in this case, only one of them is assigned. The one error which is assigned, however, presents substantially every ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT