Stiles v. County of Dutchess

Decision Date11 December 2000
Citation717 N.Y.S.2d 325,278 A.D.2d 304
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
PartiesHOWARD STILES et al., Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>COUNTY OF DUTCHESS et al., Respondents.

Ritter, J.P., Thompson, Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The defendants demonstrated their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that the plaintiff Howard Stiles violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1141 when he made a left turn directly into the path of their vehicle. Stiles was negligent in failing to see that which, under the circumstances, he should have seen, and in crossing in front of the defendants' vehicle when it was hazardous to do so (see, Pryor v Reichert, 265 AD2d 470; Canceleno v Johnston, 264 AD2d 405; Smalley v McCarthy, 254 AD2d 478; Feder v Greco, 240 AD2d 364). The operator of the defendants' vehicle, who had the right-of-way, was entitled to anticipate that Stiles would obey the traffic laws which required him to yield (see, Cenovski v Lee, 266 AD2d 424; Namisnak v Martin, 244 AD2d 258, 260). The record does not support the plaintiffs' contention that there are issues of fact as to whether the operator of the defendants' vehicle was negligent in the operation of his vehicle (see, Cenovski v Lee, supra).

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 cases
  • Rosado v. Bagnall, 2008 NY Slip Op 31971(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 7/3/2008), 0005571/2006.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • July 3, 2008
    ...514, 748 N.Y.S.2d 871 (2d Dept. 2003); Agin v. Rehfeldt, 284 A.D.2d 352, 726 N.Y.S.2d 131 (2d Dept 2001); Stiles v. County of Dutchess, 278 A.D.2d 304, 717 N.Y.S.2d 325 (2d Dept.2000)]." Gabler v. Marly Bldg. Supply Corp., supra. See, also, Berner v. Koegel, 31 A.D.3d 591 (2d Dept.2006)["Th......
  • Liao v. Alvarenea, 2007 NY Slip Op 31129(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 4/27/2007)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • April 27, 2007
    ...514, 748 N.Y.S.2d 871 (2d Dept. 2003); Agin v. Rehfeldt, 284 A.D.2d 352, 726 N.Y.S.2d 131 (2d Dept 2001); Stiles v. County of Dutchess, 278 A.D.2d 304, 717 N.Y.S.2d 325 (2d Dept.2000)]." Gabler v. Marly Bldg. Supply Corp., supra. See, also, Berner v. Koegel, 31 A.D.3d 591 (2d Dept.2006)["Th......
  • D'Amato v. Cantone
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • September 5, 2019
    ...5 A.D.3d 469, 773 N.Y.S.2d 101 [2004]; Breslin v Rudden, 291 A.D.2d 471, 738 N.Y.S.2d 674 [2002]; Agin v Rehfeldt, supra; Stiles v County of Dutchess, supra; Zambrano Philhwan Seok, supra; Bolta v Lohan, 242 A.D.2d 356, 661 N.Y.S.2d 286 [1997]; see also Weigand v United Traction Co., 221 NY......
  • Davoli v. Meade
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • June 26, 2018
    ... ... light at the intersection of County Road 83 a/k/a ... Patchogue-Mount Sinai Road, Town of Brookhaven, Suffolk ... County, ... Rehfeldt, 284 A.D.2d ... 352, 726N.Y.S.2d 131 [2001]; Stiles v. County of ... Dutchess, 278 A.D.2d 304, 717 N.Y.S.2d 325 [2000]). As ... the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT