Stiles v. Lambert, 5 Div. 667
Decision Date | 04 April 1957 |
Docket Number | 5 Div. 667 |
Parties | Cliff STILES v. H. H. LAMBERT. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Walker & Walker, Opelika, for petitioner.
Jerome Phillips, Birmingham, opposed.
As we interpret the opinion of the Court of Appeals, based on the assignment of error which that court reviewed, the court reached a conclusion of fact. Since this appears to be true, this court will not review the finding of the Court of Appeals.
In Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. Osborne, 242 Ala. 589, 7 So.2d 319, 320, this court said:
The result is that the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jones Val. Finance Co. v. Tennille, 6 Div. 645
... ... See also Stiles v. Lambert, 39 Ala.App. 15, 94 So.2d 784, affirmed 266 Ala. 184, 94 So.2d ... 'Warburton v. John Wanamaker Philadelphia [329 Pa. 5] 196 A. 506 ... 'Hazel Atlas Glass Co. v. Van Dyke [Dyke] & Reeves, ... ...
-
Roberson v. Harris
... ... The amount sued for was $5,000.00 in each count ... The record ... Stiles v. Lambert, 39 Ala.App. 15, 94 So.2d 784, affirmed 266 Ala ... ...
-
Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Stokes
... ... V. Stokes, Jr., et al ... 4 Div. 316 ... Supreme Court of Alabama ... Aug. 7, 1969 ... coverage as to property damage in the amount of $5,000.00 for each occurrence.' ... Paragraph ... Wells, 265 Ala. 149, 90 So.2d 256; StilesWells, 265 Ala. 149, 90 So.2d 256; Stiles v. Lambert ... ...
-
State ex rel. Richardson v. Morrow, 6 Div. 53
... ... On 5 February 1963, Poland J. Richardson, acting as Mayor of the City of ... 1. See Stiles v. Lambert, 39 Ala.App. 15, 94 So.2d 784, affd. 266 Ala. 184, 94 So.2d ... ...