Stillman v. Hart

Decision Date16 November 1903
Docket Number1,266.
Citation126 F. 359
PartiesSTILLMAN v. HART, Clerk.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

L. G Denman, for appellant.

Clarence H. Miller, for appellee.

Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In the case of C. B. Combe, Executor, et al., V. James Stillman et al., heretofore pending in the Circuit Court in and for the Western District of Texas, at Brownsville, an order was made on the 23d day of May, 1899, under which James Stillman, one of the defendants, paid into the hands of a receiver in the cause the sum of $50,000 in cash, which was thereafter deposited in the National Bank of San Antonio, Tex., to the credit of the court. Thereafter, and on the 11th day of February, 1903, on application of the clerk of the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of Texas to certify and transfer the said fund to the credit of the court to which the said case of C. B. Combe, Executor, et al. V James Stillman had been transferred by operation of law, the Circuit Court for the Western District of Texas, among other things, decreed as follows:

'It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed by the court that D. H. Hart, clerk of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas, forthwith draw a check on the San Antonio National Bank of San Antonio, Texas, to be countersigned by a judge of this court, payable to the order of D. H. Hart, as such clerk, for the sum of $500, the amount found by the court to be due him, as one percent, commission under section 828 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, for receiving, keeping, and paying out said above-mentioned fund of $50,000; and, further, that said Hart, clerk, draw a check on said San Antonio National Bank to be countersigned by a judge of this court, payable to the order of C. Dart, clerk of the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of Texas, for the sum of $49,500 the remainder of said fund-- the same, when received, to be deposited by said Dart, clerk, in the South Texas National Bank of Houston, Texas, pursuant to the aforesaid order of the Honorable W. T. Burns.'

From that part of the decree allowing the clerk, Hart, to withdraw and retain $500 of the said fund, the defendant James Stillman sued out this appeal.

A motion has been made to dismiss on the ground that the appeal is from an interlocutory decree merely taxing costs. We are of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Rector v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 28 Mayo 1927
    ...sitting in bankruptcy, the final decision of it would have been reviewable in this court by writ of error or appeal." In Stillman v. Hart, 126 F. 359 (C. C. A. 5), an order allowing clerk a commission of $500 on deposited fund and directing check to be drawn therefor on fund. Court (page 36......
  • State ex rel. Yale University v. Sartorius
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 28 Julio 1942
    ... ... cause." Wehrs v. Sullivan, 187 S.W. 825; ... Rossi v. Caire, 174 Cal. 74, 161 P. 1161; Julian ... v. Schwartz, 34 P.2d 487; Stillman v. Hart, 126 ... F. 359. (6) Relator is an "aggrieved" party within ... the meaning of that term as used in the statute requiring the ... Circuit ... ...
  • Weltner v. Thurmond
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 24 Diciembre 1908
    ... ... 324; Ogden v. Bear Lake, 18 Utah 279; Bank v ... Bank, 103 Wis. 39; Bank v. Bank, 127 N.C. 432; ... In re. R. R. Co., 124 F. 727; Stillman v. Hart, 126 ... F. 359; In re. Currier Est. (Colo.) 74 P. 340; Boyd Co. v ... Arthur, (Ky.) 82 S.W. 613; Strull v. R. R. Co., ... (Ky.) 76 S.W ... ...
  • Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 15 Diciembre 1936
    ...as to those funds, a final one, subject to be appealed from. Texas Co. v. International & G. N. Ry. Co. (C.C.A.) 237 F. 921; Stillman v. Hart (C.C.A.) 126 F. 359. The motion to dismiss the appeal is On the merits, this case is largely controlled by the general rule announced in our decision......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT