Stinson v. Richardson
| Decision Date | 07 March 1940 |
| Docket Number | 7 Div. 529. |
| Citation | Stinson v. Richardson, 239 Ala. 161, 194 So. 508 (Ala. 1940) |
| Parties | STINSON v. RICHARDSON. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Cherokee County; A. E. Hawkins, Judge.
Action for assault and battery by J. H. Stinson against Hugh Richardson.From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
McCord & Miller, of Gadsden, and Irby A. Keener, of Centre, for appellant.
No attorney marked for appellee.
Suit for assault and battery.Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
That defendant struck plaintiff on the head with a stick resulting in rather severe injury, does not appear to be denied.Defendant rests in large part upon the doctrine of self-defense.As to who was the aggressor was in sharp dispute, as well as all other matters relating to the question of self-defense.
There had been a prior difficulty a short time before.The fact of such difficulty and its gravity may be shown, but not the particulars.McAnally v. State,74 Ala. 9;Buffalow v. State,219 Ala. 407, 122 So. 633.That plaintiff in the previous difficulty drew a pistol and threatened the life of defendant is within the rule permitting proof to show its gravity.Buffalow v. Statesupra.
We are inclined to the view the ruling of the court did not transcend the limitations fixed by our decisions, though in view of our conclusion for a reversal on the point next to be considered, no necessity exists that we stop to make minute inspection as to this matter.Plaintiff denied he had previously drawn a pistol on defendant, when so asked on cross-examination.But defendant, over objection, was permitted to elicit from the plaintiff the admission that he had been convicted in the county court of pointing a pistol at defendant, and that the case was then pending on appeal in the circuit court.There has been no finality to that prosecution, and its...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Surrency v. Harbison
...subsequent acts may be considered for this purpose. See Holcombe v. Whitaker, 294 Ala. 430, 318 So.2d 289 (1975); Stinson v. Richardson, 239 Ala. 161, 194 So. 508 (1940); Riddle v. Brown, 20 Ala. 412 Furthermore, Harbison may be entitled to recover punitive damages if he shows that he suffe......
-
Hoomes v. State
... ... admissible in Nelson v. State, 13 Ala.App. 28, 68 ... To like ... effect is the holding in Stinson v. Richardson, 239 ... Ala. 161, 194 So. 508. See also, Woods v. State, 20 ... Ala.App. 200, 101 So. 314; Wright v. State, 19 ... Ala.App. 562, 99 ... ...
- Wilcox Inv. Grp., LLC v. P & D, LLC.
-
Spain v. State
...tending to show that decedent was the aggressor. Buffalow v. State, 219 Ala. 407, 122 So. 633, 634. To like effect is Stinson v. Richardson, 239 Ala. 161, 194 So. 508. Compare Harkness v. State, 129 Ala. 71, 30 So. A review of the testimony excerpted above shows that actually the only detai......