Stinson v. State, 6 Div. 351
Decision Date | 16 June 1966 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 351 |
Citation | 188 So.2d 288,279 Ala. 691 |
Parties | Donald V. STINSON v. STATE of Alabama. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
Donald V. Stinson, pro se.
Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Julian S. Pinkston, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.
Petition of Donald V. Stinson, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision in Stinson v. State, 188 So.2d 287.
Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial6 cases
-
Self v. State
...in ordering that he be released on a writ of habeas corpus. See Stinson v. State, 43 Ala.App. 257, 188 So.2d 287, cert. den. 279 Ala. 691, 188 So.2d 288. There can be no "negligence" in failing to do that which the State is not authorized or empowered to In Ferrari, supra, which the majorit......
-
Holcomb v. State
...207 So.2d 119 ... 44 Ala.App. 259 ... 8 Div. 135 ... Court of Appeals of Alabama ... Nov. 21, 1967 ... Rehearing ... on December 12, 1966, at his (the witnesses') trailer, at about 6:40 P.M.; that appellant brought to the witness a letter from a man to whom ... Parrish, 242 Ala. 7, 5 So.2d 828 ... The case of Stinson v. State, 279 Ala. 691, 188 So.2d 287, states in part as follows: ... 'The ... ...
-
Moreno v. State
... ... present holding of the petitioner. Stinson v. State, ... 43 Ala.App. 257, 188 So.2d 287, cert. denied, 279 Ala ... by Art. I, § 6, of the Alabama Constitution, 1901. As ... noted, an evaluation of ... ...
-
Self v. State
...in ordering that he be released on a writ of habeas corpus. See, Stinson v. State, 43 Ala.App. 257, 188 So.2d 287, cert. den. 279 Ala. 691, 188 So.2d 288. There can be no 'negligence' in failing to do that which the State is not authorized or empowered to "In Ferrari, supra, which the major......
Request a trial to view additional results