Stock v. City-Parish of East Baton Rouge

Decision Date17 May 1988
Docket NumberCITY-PARISH,No. CA,CA
PartiesRobert N. STOCK, et al. v.OF EAST BATON ROUGE. 87 0411. 525 So.2d 675
CourtCourt of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US

Michael R. Connelly, Baton Rouge, for plaintiffs-appellants Robert N. Stock, et al.

Larry D. Book, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee City of Baton Rouge, etc.

Before LOTTINGER, EDWARDS and ALFORD, JJ.

EDWARDS, Judge.

From a judgment dismissing part of his claim against the City-Parish of East Baton Rouge, plaintiff appeals. 1 We reverse and remand. Plaintiff brought this suit against the City-Parish, Parish Water Company, Inc., and Baton Rouge Water Works Company to enjoin the enforcement of East Baton Rouge City-Parish Ordinance 7853, which allows for the disconnection of water services for failure to pay the sewer user fee charges, and to obtain a refund of those charges.

Plaintiff claims the ordinance is unconstitutional because it was a tax that was never submitted to voters of the Parish, that it interferes with private contracts, and that it is being discriminately applied. The City-Parish filed an exception of no cause of action, contending that plaintiff had alleged no facts which if proved would state a cause of action as to any of plaintiff's claims. Alternatively the City-Parish moved for summary judgment, contending that there were no genuine issues of material fact, and that it was entitled to judgment in its favor as a matter of law. The trial court sustained the City-Parish's exception of no cause of action and granted summary judgment in favor of the City-Parish on all issues except those relative to selected enforcement. 2

The objection of no cause of action tests the legal sufficiency of the petition. No evidence may be introduced to support or controvert the objection of no cause of action. LSA-C.C.P. art. 931. For purposes of ruling on the exception of no cause of action, the court must accept all allegations of the petition as true, and sustain the exception only if the law affords no remedy under the allegations of the petition. "If a petition states a cause of action on any ground or portion of the demand, the objection of no cause of action must be overruled." Harris v. Steele, 506 So.2d 542, 543 (La.App. 1st Cir.), cert. denied, 511 So.2d 1155 (La.1987). The trial court held that plaintiff had stated a cause of action on the grounds of selective enforcement. Having stated a cause of action on the grounds of selective enforcement of the ordinance, plaintiff's petition has stated a cause of action, and the exception of no cause of action should have been overruled.

The trial court judgment, however, also...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Great Southwest Fire Ins. Co. v. CNA Ins. Companies
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • July 12, 1989
    ...under any evidence admissible under the pleadings. Darville v. Texaco, Inc., 447 So.2d 473 (La.1984); Stock v. East Baton Rouge City-Parish, 525 So.2d 675 (La.App. 1 Cir.1988). If the petition states a cause of action as to any ground or portion of the demand, the exception of no cause of a......
  • Tugwell v. State Farm Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • March 6, 1992
    ...v. John E. Graham & Sons, Inc., 533 So.2d 975 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 534 So.2d 431 (La.1988); Stock v. City-Parish of East Baton Rouge, 525 So.2d 675 (La.App. 1st Cir.1988). The parties hereto have not alleged or shown irreparable injury. Accordingly, the summary judgment granted ......
  • Penalber v. Blount
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • October 23, 1989
    ...asserted. LSA-C.C.P. art. 931; Robinson v. North American Royalties, Inc., 470 So.2d 112 (La.1985); Stock v. City-Parish of East Baton Rouge, 525 So.2d 675, 676 (La.App. 1st Cir.1988). Our review of the law reveals Connelly correctly asserts, that under the facts, no cause of action exists ......
  • Bellah v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • June 28, 1989
    ...under any evidence admissible under the pleadings. Darville v. Texaco, Inc., 447 So.2d 473 (La.1984); Stock v. East Baton Rouge City-Parish, 525 So.2d 675 (La.App. 1 Cir.1988). If the petition states a cause of action as to any ground or portion of the demand, the exception of no cause of a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT